Literature DB >> 11979149

Efficacy of the iodine-free computed tomography liver contrast agent, Dy-EOB-DTPA, in comparison with a conventional iodinated agent in normal and in tumor-bearing rabbits.

Werner Krause1, Kerstin Handreke, G Schuhmann-Giampieri, K Rupp.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of the new liver-specific x-ray contrast agent, Dy-EOB-DTPA, in rabbits with VX2 liver tumors by spiral computed tomography (CT) in comparison to iopromide.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The time course of liver enhancement was determined in five groups of two normal anesthetized rabbits, which received intravenous injections of Dy-EOB-DTPA before anesthesia at a dose of 0.5 mmol/kg. Fifteen, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after administration spiral CT images were obtained and the attenuation in the livers were determined. A second group of ten rabbits with implanted VX2 tumors received in a random crossover design either Dy-EOB-DTPA at a dose of 0.5 mmol/kg or, 1 day later, iopromide at a dose of 600 mg iodine/kg. CT images were obtained 60 minutes after Dy-EOB-DTPA administration and both in the arterial and portal-venous phases after iopromide injection. Three radiologists evaluated the images. The rabbits were killed, and their livers were investigated histologically for liver tumors.
RESULTS: In normal animals, 0.5 mmol/kg Dy-EOB-DTPA resulted in a liver enhancement of 30 HU during the whole observation period of 90 minutes. In tumor-bearing animals, histology revealed 14 implanted tumors of 3-20 mm diameter. Sixty-five percent of the tumors were below 10 mm. Dy-EOB-DTPA was able to detect 13 tumors (93%), iopromide 11 (79%) both in the arterial and in the portal-venous phase. The difference was statistically not significant. In plain CT, seven tumors (50%) were found (P < 0.01 vs iopromide and Dy-EOB-DTPA). One scar and two sites of necrosis were detected by each of the methods.
CONCLUSION: Dy-EOB-DTPA injection at a dose of 0.5 mmol/kg resulted in a long-lasting detectability of 93% of all implanted tumors versus 79% found with iopromide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11979149     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-200205000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  2 in total

Review 1.  X-ray-computed tomography contrast agents.

Authors:  Hrvoje Lusic; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Micro-CT based experimental liver imaging using a nanoparticulate contrast agent: a longitudinal study in mice.

Authors:  Hanne Boll; Stefanie Nittka; Fabian Doyon; Michael Neumaier; Alexander Marx; Martin Kramer; Christoph Groden; Marc A Brockmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.