Literature DB >> 11978741

Socioeconomic status and preterm birth: New Zealand trends, 1980 to 1999.

E D Craig1, J M D Thompson, E A Mitchell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While a number of countries have reported rising preterm birth rates over the past two decades, none has examined the effects of socioeconomic status on preterm birth at a national level. AIM: To document the changing incidence of preterm birth in New Zealand over the past 20 years and to determine whether particular socioeconomic or ethnic subsections of the population have contributed disproportionately to the changes seen.
METHODS: Birth registration data routinely available from the New Zealand Health Information Service were analysed for the period 1980-99. Information for a total of 1 079 478 singleton live births was linked by Domicile Code to the New Zealand Deprivation Index, a small area index of deprivation.
RESULTS: Singleton preterm birth rates rose by 37.2% during the 20 year period, from 4.3% in 1980 to 5.9% in 1999. Rates increased by 71.9% among those living in the most affluent areas, but by only 3.5% among those living in the most deprived areas, resulting in the disappearance of a socioeconomic gradient in preterm birth that had existed during the early 1980s.
CONCLUSIONS: This study challenges traditional thinking on the associations between socioeconomic status and preterm birth. Further research is necessary if the changes that have occurred in New Zealand over the past 20 years are to be fully understood.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11978741      PMCID: PMC1721397          DOI: 10.1136/fn.86.3.f142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  12 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts on the pathogenesis and markers of preterm births.

Authors:  G C Lu; R L Goldenberg
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.430

Review 2.  Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome: why do the poor fare so poorly?

Authors:  M S Kramer; L Séguin; J Lydon; L Goulet
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.980

3.  How important is social class a factor in preterm birth?

Authors:  J Lumley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-04-12       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M S Kramer
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Did preterm deliveries continue to decrease in France in the 1980s?

Authors:  G Bréart; B Blondel; P Tuppin; H Grandjean; M Kaminski
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.980

6.  Prematurity and occupational activity during pregnancy.

Authors:  N Mamelle; B Laumon; P Lazar
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Occupational fatigue and preterm premature rupture of membranes. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Units Network.

Authors:  R B Newman; R L Goldenberg; A H Moawad; J D Iams; P J Meis; A Das; M Miodovnik; S N Caritis; G R Thurnau; M P Dombrowski; J Roberts
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Antenatal ultrasonography in Dunedin: one year's data.

Authors:  T Buckenham; G G Spears; R L Teele
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1991-03-27

9.  Secular trends in preterm birth: a hospital-based cohort study.

Authors:  M S Kramer; R Platt; H Yang; K S Joseph; S W Wen; L Morin; R H Usher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-12-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Low birthweight, preterm, and small for gestational age babies in Scotland, 1981-1984.

Authors:  S de Sanjose; E Roman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of preterm birth.

Authors:  Janet Tucker; William McGuire
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-18

2.  Effects of individual and social factors on preterm birth and low birth weight: empirical evidence from regional data in Italy.

Authors:  Manuela Chiavarini; Francesco Bartolucci; Alessio Gili; Luca Pieroni; Liliana Minelli
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Are the risk factors for SIDS different for preterm and term infants?

Authors:  J M D Thompson; E A Mitchell
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Socioeconomic inequalities in very preterm birth rates.

Authors:  L K Smith; E S Draper; B N Manktelow; J S Dorling; D J Field
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Population based study on the outcome of small for gestational age newborns.

Authors:  D B Bartels; L Kreienbrock; O Dammann; P Wenzlaff; C F Poets
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  Neighbourhood socio-economic status and spontaneous premature birth in Alberta.

Authors:  Stephen Wood; Debbie McNeil; Wendy Yee; Jodie Siever; Sarah Rose
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2014-09-16

7.  Effects of socioeconomic position and clinical risk factors on spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm birth.

Authors:  K S Joseph; John Fahey; Ketan Shankardass; Victoria M Allen; Patricia O'Campo; Linda Dodds; Robert M Liston; Alexander C Allen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Factors associated with premature birth: a case-control study.

Authors:  Érica Cesário Defilipo; Paula Silva de Carvalho Chagas; Carolyne de Miranda Drumond; Luiz Cláudio Ribeiro
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-06

9.  Socioeconomic inequalities in survival and provision of neonatal care: population based study of very preterm infants.

Authors:  Lucy K Smith; Elizabeth S Draper; Bradley N Manktelow; David J Field
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-12-01

10.  No improvement in socioeconomic inequalities in birthweight and preterm birth over four decades: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Svetlana V Glinianaia; Rakesh Ghosh; Judith Rankin; Mark S Pearce; Louise Parker; Tanja Pless-Mulloli
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.