Literature DB >> 11978583

Environmental arsenic exposure from a coal-burning power plant as a potential risk factor for nonmelanoma skin carcinoma: results from a case-control study in the district of Prievidza, Slovakia.

Beate Pesch1, Ulrich Ranft, Pavel Jakubis, Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen, Andre Hergemöller, Klaus Unfried, Marian Jakubis, Peter Miskovic, Tom Keegan.   

Abstract

To investigate the risk of arsenic exposure from a coal-burning power plant in Slovakia on nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) development, a 1996-1999 population-based case-control study was conducted with 264 cases and 286 controls. Exposure assessment was based on residential history and annual emissions (Asres1, Asres2) and on nutritional habits and arsenic content in food (Asnut1, Asnut2). Asres1 was assessed as a function of the distance of places of residence to the plant. Asres2 additionally considered workplace locations. Asnut1 was used to calculate arsenic uptake by weighting food frequencies with arsenic concentrations and annual consumption of food items. Asnut2 additionally considered consumption of local products. Age- and gender-adjusted risk estimates for NMSC in the highest exposure category (90th vs. 30th percentile) were 1.90 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.39, 2.60) for Asres1, 1.90 (95% CI: 1.38, 2.62) for Asres2, 1.19 (95% CI: 0.64, 2.12) for Asnut1, and 1.83 (95% CI: 0.98, 3.43) for Asnut2. No interaction was found between arsenic exposure and dietary and residential data. Other plant emissions could have confounded the distance-based exposure variables. Consumption of contaminated vegetables and fruits could be confounded by the protective effects of such a diet. Nevertheless, the authors found an excess NMSC risk for environmental arsenic exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11978583     DOI: 10.1093/aje/155.9.798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  6 in total

1.  Pesticide use and cutaneous melanoma in pesticide applicators in the agricultural heath study.

Authors:  Leslie K Dennis; Charles F Lynch; Dale P Sandler; Michael C R Alavanja
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 9.031

2.  Baseline comorbidities in a skin cancer prevention trial in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Maria Argos; Mahfuzar Rahman; Faruque Parvez; James Dignam; Tariqul Islam; Iftekhar Quasem; Samar K Hore; Ahmed T Haider; Zahid Hossain; Tazul I Patwary; Muhammad Rakibuz-Zaman; Golam Sarwar; Paul La Porte; Judith Harjes; Kristen Anton; Muhammad G Kibriya; Farzana Jasmine; Rashed Khan; Mohammed Kamal; Christopher R Shea; Muhammad Yunus; John A Baron; Habibul Ahsan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 4.686

3.  Ecological and human health risk aspects of burning arsenic-rich coal.

Authors:  Vladimír Bencko; Jirí Rames; Eleonora Fabiánová; Jirí Pesek; Marián Jakubis
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 4.  Drinking Water Arsenic Contamination, Skin Lesions, and Malignancies: A Systematic Review of the Global Evidence.

Authors:  Margaret R Karagas; Anala Gossai; Brandon Pierce; Habibul Ahsan
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-03

5.  Geography of non-melanoma skin cancer and ecological associations with environmental risk factors in England.

Authors:  B W Wheeler; G Kothencz; A S Pollard
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Association between arsenic exposure from a coal-burning power plant and urinary arsenic concentrations in Prievidza District, Slovakia.

Authors:  Ulrich Ranft; Peter Miskovic; Beate Pesch; Pavel Jakubis; Elenora Fabianova; Tom Keegan; Andre Hergemöller; Marian Jakubis; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.