Literature DB >> 11978335

Long-term effectiveness and safety of pravastatin in 9014 patients with coronary heart disease and average cholesterol concentrations: the LIPID trial follow-up.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) study showed that pravastatin therapy over 6 years reduced mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with previous acute coronary syndromes and average cholesterol concentrations. We assessed the longer-term effects of initial treatment with pravastatin on further cardiovascular events and mortality over a total follow-up period of 8 years.
METHODS: In the main trial, 9014 patients with previous myocardial infarction or unstable angina and a baseline plasma cholesterol concentration of 4.0-7.0 mmol/L were randomly assigned pravastatin 40 mg daily or placebo and followed up for 6 years. Subsequently, all patients were offered open-label pravastatin for 2 more years. Major cardiovascular events and adverse events were compared according to initial treatment assignment.
FINDINGS: 7680 (97% of those still alive) had 2 years of extended follow-up. 3766 (86%) of those assigned placebo and 3914 (88%) assigned pravastatin agreed to take open-label pravastatin. During this period, patients originally assigned pravastatin had almost identical cholesterol concentrations to those assigned placebo, but a lower risk of death from all causes (219 [5.6%] vs 255 [6.8%], p=0.029), coronary heart disease (CHD) death (108 [2.8%] vs 137 [3.6%], p=0.026), and CHD death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (176 [4.5%] vs 196 [5.2%], p=0.08). Over the total 8-year period, all-cause mortality was 888 (19.7%) in the group originally assigned placebo and 717 (15.9%) in the group originally assigned pravastatin, CHD mortality was 510 (11.3%) versus 395 (8.8%), myocardial infarction was 570 (12.7%) versus 435 (9.6%; each p < 0.0001), and stroke was 272 (6.0%) versus 224 (5.0%; p=0.015). Stronger evidence of separate treatment benefits than in the main trial was seen in important prespecified subgroups (women, patients aged > or = 70 years, and those with total cholesterol < 5.5 mmol/L). Pravastatin had no significant adverse effects.
INTERPRETATION: The evidence of sustained treatment benefits and safety of long-term pravastatin treatment reinforces the importance of long-term cholesterol-lowering treatment for almost all patients with previous CHD events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11978335     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08351-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  62 in total

1.  Clinical implications of statin event trials.

Authors:  Anne Carol Goldberg
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Bias in observational studies of prevalent users: lessons for comparative effectiveness research from a meta-analysis of statins.

Authors:  Goodarz Danaei; Mohammad Tavakkoli; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  Lipids and the elderly.

Authors:  Wilbert S Aronow
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 4.  Use of statins and risk of haematological malignancies: a meta-analysis of six randomized clinical trials and eight observational studies.

Authors:  Stefanos Bonovas; Kalitsa Filioussi; Argirios Tsantes; Nikolaos M Sitaras
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Can statins reduce risk of lung cancer, especially among elderly people? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhantao Deng; Shu Zhang; Long Yi; Shilin Chen
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Low-dose pravastatin and age-related differences in risk factors for cardiovascular disease in hypercholesterolaemic Japanese: analysis of the management of elevated cholesterol in the primary prevention group of adult Japanese (MEGA study).

Authors:  Noriaki Nakaya; Kyoichi Mizuno; Yasuo Ohashi; Tamio Teramoto; Shinji Yokoyama; Katsumi Hirahara; Masahiro Mizutani; Haruo Nakamura
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Statins and total (not LDL) cholesterol concentration and outcome of myocardial infarction: results from a meta-analysis and an observational study.

Authors:  Xia Sheng; Li Wei; Michael J Murphy; Thomas M MacDonald
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 8.  Clinical significance of 'cardiometabolic memory': a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hiroshi Itoh; Isao Kurihara; Kazutoshi Miyashita; Masami Tanaka
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.872

9.  Statins and mortality: the untold story.

Authors:  Michael S Kostapanos; Moses S Elisaf
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Preadmission statin use and one-year mortality among patients in intensive care - a cohort study.

Authors:  Steffen Christensen; Reimar W Thomsen; Martin B Johansen; Lars Pedersen; Reinhold Jensen; Kim M Larsen; Anders Larsson; Else Tønnesen; Henrik Toft Sørensen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.