Literature DB >> 11978151

Clinical implications of endotoxin concentrations in vaccines.

David A Geier1, Mark R Geier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A previous study suggested that high concentrations of endotoxin may be present in whole-cell diphtheria/tetanus/pertussis (DTP) vaccine, and the scientific literature contains many studies examining the reactivity of whole-cell DTP vaccine. The medical and scientific communities have previously reported that the presence of endotoxin in commercial vaccines may have negative effects on vaccine recipients.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the endotoxin concentrations in whole-cell DTP, acellular DTP(DTaP), and DT vaccines and determine the clinical experience with each vaccine.
METHODS: To study the endotoxin concentrations in vaccines, the Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay was used. The vaccines analyzed with the LAL assay were whole-cell DTP vaccine lots manufactured by Connaught, Lederle, the Michigan and Massachusetts Departments of Health, and Wyeth; DTaP vaccine lots manufactured by Merieux and Takeda; and DT vaccine lots manufactured by Wyeth and Lederle. The incidence of adverse reactions following whole-cell DTP, DTaP, and DT vaccines were determined based on analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database.
RESULTS: The results of the LAL assay showed that whole-cell DTP vaccines contained considerably more endotoxin than either DTaP or DT vaccines. The VAERS showed that statistically significantly more adverse reactions were associated with whole-cell DTP vaccine than DTaP or DT vaccines.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis confirmed higher concentrations of endotoxin in whole-cell DTP vaccines compared with DTaP or DT vaccines. As high concentrations of endotoxin may be correlated with a higher incidence of adverse events, the switch from whole-cell DTP to DTaP for routine vaccinations in the US seems well justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11978151     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1A410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  5 in total

1.  The Adjuvant Bordetella Colonization Factor A Attenuates Alum-Induced Th2 Responses and Enhances Bordetella pertussis Clearance from Mouse Lungs.

Authors:  Jamie Jennings-Gee; Sally Quataert; Tridib Ganguly; Ralph D'Agostino; Rajendar Deora; Purnima Dubey
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Multivalent recombinant protein vaccine against coccidioidomycosis.

Authors:  Eric J Tarcha; Venkatesha Basrur; Chiung-Yu Hung; Malcolm J Gardner; Garry T Cole
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Incidence of adverse reactions to vaccines in a paediatric population.

Authors:  Pilar Carrasco-Garrido; Carmen Gallardo-Pino; Rodrigo Jiménez-García; Miguel A Tapias; Angel Gil de Miguel
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  The characteristics and trend of adverse events following immunization reported by information system in Jiangsu province, China, 2015-2018.

Authors:  Ran Hu; Shanshan Peng; Yuanbao Liu; Fengyang Tang; Zhiguo Wang; Lei Zhang; Jun Gao; Hongxiong Guo
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  A proteoliposome formulation derived from Bordetella pertussis induces protection in two murine challenge models.

Authors:  Sonsire Fernández; Esther M Fajardo; Aleida Mandiarote; Gemma Año; Maria A Padrón; Michel Acosta; Rubén A Cabrera; Luis A Riverón; Maydelis Álvarez; Kirenia Blaín; Mildrey Fariñas; Daniel Cardoso; Luis G García; Concepción Campa; José L Pérez
Journal:  BMC Immunol       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.615

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.