Literature DB >> 11977112

Prediction of pharmacokinetics prior to in vivo studies. II. Generic physiologically based pharmacokinetic models of drug disposition.

Patrick Poulin1, Frank-Peter Theil.   

Abstract

Many in vitro data on physicochemical properties and specific absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME) processes are already available at early stages of drug discovery. These data about new drug candidates could be integrated/connected in physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models to estimate a priori the overall plasma and tissue kinetic behaviors under in vivo conditions. The objective of the present study was to illustrate that generic PBPK models integrating such data can be developed in drug discovery prior to any in vivo studies. This approach was illustrated with three example compounds, including two lipophilic bases (diazepam, propranolol) and one neutral more hydrophilic drug (ethoxybenzamide). Distribution and liver metabolism were the processes integrated in the generic rat PBPK models of disposition. Tissue:plasma partition coefficients (P(t:p)s) used for description of distribution were estimated from established tissue composition-based equations, which need only in vitro data on drug lipophilicity and plasma protein binding as sole input parameters. Furthermore, data on intrinsic clearance (CL(int)) determined in vitro with hepatocytes were scaled to the in vivo situation to estimate hepatic metabolic clearance. These prediction approaches were both incorporated in the PBPK models to enable automated estimation of distribution and liver metabolism for each drug studied. The generic PBPK models suggested can simulate a priori concentration-time profiles of plasma and several tissues after intravenous administrations to rat. The results indicate that most of the simulated concentration-time profiles of plasma and 10 tissues are in reasonable agreement with the corresponding experimental data determined in vivo (less than a factor of two). However, some more relevant deviations were observed for specific tissues (brain and gut for diazepam; liver and gut for ethoxybenzamide; lung for propranolol) because of important ADME processes were probably neglected in the PBPK models of these drugs. In this context, generic PBPK models were also used for mechanistic evaluations of pharmacokinetics for generating research hypotheses to understand these deviations. Overall, the present generic and integrative PBPK approach of drug disposition suggested as a tool for a priori simulations and mechanistic evaluations of pharmacokinetics has the potential to improve the selection and optimization of new drug candidates. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmaceutical Association

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11977112     DOI: 10.1002/jps.10128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  75 in total

1.  Prediction of in vivo tissue distribution from in vitro data. 3. Correlation between in vitro and in vivo tissue distribution of a homologous series of nine 5-n-alkyl-5-ethyl barbituric acids.

Authors:  Peter Ballard; David E Leahy; Malcolm Rowland
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  A novel strategy for physiologically based predictions of human pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Hannah M Jones; Neil Parrott; Karin Jorga; Thierry Lavé
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling: a sub-compartmentalized model of tissue distribution.

Authors:  Max von Kleist; Wilhelm Huisinga
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 4.  To scale or not to scale: the principles of dose extrapolation.

Authors:  Vijay Sharma; John H McNeill
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetics of Dexamethasone in Rats.

Authors:  Dawei Song; Le Sun; Debra C DuBois; Richard R Almon; Shengnan Meng; William J Jusko
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.922

6.  The quantitative prediction of CYP-mediated drug interaction by physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling.

Authors:  Motohiro Kato; Yoshihisa Shitara; Hitoshi Sato; Kunihiro Yoshisue; Masaru Hirano; Toshihiko Ikeda; Yuichi Sugiyama
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 7.  Using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic-guided "body-on-a-chip" systems to predict mammalian response to drug and chemical exposure.

Authors:  Jong Hwan Sung; Balaji Srinivasan; Mandy Brigitte Esch; William T McLamb; Catia Bernabini; Michael L Shuler; James J Hickman
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2014-06-20

8.  Simulation of human intravenous and oral pharmacokinetics of 21 diverse compounds using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling.

Authors:  Hannah M Jones; Iain B Gardner; Wendy T Collard; Phil J Stanley; Penny Oxley; Natilie A Hosea; David Plowchalk; Steve Gernhardt; Jing Lin; Maurice Dickins; S Ravi Rahavendran; Barry C Jones; Kenny J Watson; Henry Pertinez; Vikas Kumar; Susan Cole
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Drug Distribution Part 2. Predicting Volume of Distribution from Plasma Protein Binding and Membrane Partitioning.

Authors:  Ken Korzekwa; Swati Nagar
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Reduction and lumping of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models: prediction of the disposition of fentanyl and pethidine in humans by successively simplified models.

Authors:  Sven Björkman
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.