Literature DB >> 11977007

Developing an instrument to measure and describe clinical decision making in different nursing fields.

Sirkka Lauri1, Sanna Salanterä.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and test a decision-making instrument for nursing, to consider the nursing decision-making models in different nursing fields, and to create a scoring system for the instrument. A 56-item instrument was developed on the basis of different decision-making theories and earlier studies about nursing decision making. The instrument was evaluated by using several different convenience samples of nurses from seven different countries (N = 1,460). Statistical analysis used were correlation coefficients, factor analysis, factor scores, and factor reliability coefficients. The results indicated that nurses from different countries and working in different fields of nursing respond similarly. The results of the studies using the 56-item instrument showed that nurses use four kinds of decision-making models (analytical, analytical-intuitive, intuitive-analytical, and intuitive). The factor reliability scores were high (alpha = 0.85-0.91). According to the results, 60 per cent of the nurses used the analytical-intuitive and intuitive-analytical decision-making models, 14 per cent used the analytical model, and 26 per cent used the intuitive model. However, these models vary both between and within different fields of nursing. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11977007     DOI: 10.1053/jpnu.2002.32344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prof Nurs        ISSN: 8755-7223            Impact factor:   2.104


  7 in total

1.  Clinical decision making of nurses working in hospital settings.

Authors:  Ida Torunn Bjørk; Glenys A Hamilton
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2011-09-28

2.  Characteristics of Finnish and Swedish intensive care nursing narratives: a comparative analysis to support the development of clinical language technologies.

Authors:  Helen Allvin; Elin Carlsson; Hercules Dalianis; Riitta Danielsson-Ojala; Vidas Daudaravičius; Martin Hassel; Dimitrios Kokkinakis; Heljä Lundgrén-Laine; Gunnar H Nilsson; Oystein Nytrø; Sanna Salanterä; Maria Skeppstedt; Hanna Suominen; Sumithra Velupillai
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2011-07-14

3.  Managing daily intensive care activities: an observational study concerning ad hoc decision making of charge nurses and intensivists.

Authors:  Heljä Lundgrén-Laine; Elina Kontio; Juha Perttilä; Heikki Korvenranta; Jari Forsström; Sanna Salanterä
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Clinical decision-making of bachelor and clinical internship (professional) nursing students in Indonesia.

Authors:  Annissa Novalia; Shanti Farida Rachmi; Krisna Yetti
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2021-12-01

5.  The effect of evidence-based nursing education on nurses' clinical decision making: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Parisa Ghodsi Astan; Rasoul Goli; Masumeh Hemmati Maslakpak; Javad Rasouli; Leyla Alilu
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-20

6.  Survey of critical thinking and clinical decision making in nursing student of Kerman University.

Authors:  Esmat Noohi; Maryam Karimi-Noghondar; Aliakbar Haghdoost
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2012-09

Review 7.  The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review.

Authors:  Desirée Kozlowski; Marie Hutchinson; John Hurley; Joanne Rowley; Joanna Sutherland
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.