Literature DB >> 11976860

Colonic diverticulitis: impact of imaging on surgical management -- a prospective study of 542 patients.

P Ambrosetti1, C Becker, F Terrier.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the CT and the water-soluble contrast enema (CE) in the diagnosis and the severity of acute left-colonic diverticulitis, and to recognize the impact of CT during the acute phase and after a first acute episode successfully treated medically. From 1986 to 1997, all patients admitted in our emergency center with clinically suspected left-colonic diverticulitis had a CE and a CT within 72 h of their admission, unless clinical findings required immediate laparotomy. They were prospectively included in the study if one or both radiological exams showed signs of acute diverticulitis and/or diverticulitis was surgically removed and histologically proven. Diverticulitis was considered moderate when CT showed localized thickening of the colonic wall (5 mm or more) and inflammation of pericolic fat and CE showed segmental lumen narrowing and tethered mucosa; it was considered severe when abscess and/or extraluminal air and/or contrast were observed on CT and when one or both of the latter signs were seen on CE. Five hundred forty-two patients entered the study; 465 patients (86%) had a CT exam, 439 (81%) had a CE, and 420 (77%) had both exams. The performance of CT is significantly superior to CE in terms of sensitivity (98 vs 92%, p<0.01), and in the evaluation of the severity of the inflammation (26 vs 9%, p<0.02). Moreover, of 69 patients who had an associated abscess seen on CT, only 20 (29%) had indirect signs of this complication on CE. During the acute phase the chances of medical treatment failure are statistically greater when diverticulitis is considered severe on CT than when it is considered moderate (26% for the severe diverticulitis vs 4% for the moderate ones, p<0.0001). After successful medical treatment of the acute episode, patients with severe diverticulitis on the CT had statistically greater incidence of secondary bad outcome than patients with moderate diverticulitis (36 vs 17%, p<0.0001). Computed tomography should be preferred to CE as the initial radiological exam of diverticulitis because of its statistically significant superiority in sensitivity and for its statistically much higher performance in the detection of severe infection, especially when an abscess is associated with the disease. The severity of diverticulitis on CT is statistically predictive of the risk of medical treatment failure during the acute phase and of the chances of bad secondary outcome after a successful medical treatment of the first episode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11976860     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-001-1143-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  62 in total

1.  Acute colonic diverticulitis: CT or ultrasound?

Authors:  Jean-Michel Bruel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Imaging update: acute colonic diverticulitis.

Authors:  Kristen K Destigter; David P Keating
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-08

3.  How complicated is complicated diverticulitis?--phlegmonous diverticulitis revisited.

Authors:  Christian F Jurowich; Stefanie Jellouschek; Ralf Adamus; Reinhard Loose; Annette Kaiser; Christoph Isbert; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Burkhard H A von Rahden
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Pictorial review: magnetic resonance imaging of colonic diverticulitis.

Authors:  Orla Buckley; Tony Geoghegan; Grainne McAuley; Thara Persaud; Faisal Khosa; William C Torreggiani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Imaging and interventional techniques in acute left-sided diverticulitis.

Authors:  Mark E Baker
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Recurrent left colonic diverticulitis episodes: more severe than the initial diverticulitis?

Authors:  Olivier Pittet; Nikos Kotzampassakis; Sabine Schmidt; Alban Denys; Nicolas Demartines; Jean-Marie Calmes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Reduced-dose abdominopelvic CT using hybrid iterative reconstruction in suspected left-sided colonic diverticulitis.

Authors:  Azien Laqmani; Simon Veldhoen; Simon Dulz; Thorsten Derlin; Cyrus Behzadi; Jakob Schmidt-Holtz; Felicia Wassenberg; Susanne Sehner; Hans-Dieter Nagel; Gerhard Adam; Marc Regier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Italian consensus conference for colonic diverticulosis and diverticular disease.

Authors:  Rosario Cuomo; Giovanni Barbara; Fabio Pace; Vito Annese; Gabrio Bassotti; Gian Andrea Binda; Tino Casetti; Antonio Colecchia; Davide Festi; Roberto Fiocca; Andrea Laghi; Giovanni Maconi; Riccardo Nascimbeni; Carmelo Scarpignato; Vincenzo Villanacci; Bruno Annibale
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.623

9.  Long-term quality of life after conservative treatment versus surgery for different stages of acute sigmoid diverticulitis.

Authors:  Martina Brandlhuber; Christian Genzinger; Bernhard Brandlhuber; Wieland H Sommer; Mario H Müller; Martin E Kreis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging based colonography for diagnosis and assessment of diverticulosis and diverticulitis.

Authors:  Andreas G Schreyer; Alois Fürst; Ayman Agha; Ron Kikinis; Karl Scheibl; Jürgen Schölmerich; Stefan Feuerbach; Hans Herfarth; Johannes Seitz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.