Literature DB >> 11976854

Lymph node metastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: MR imaging with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (Sinerem MR) -- results of a phase-III multicenter clinical trial.

R Sigal1, T Vogl, J Casselman, G Moulin, F Veillon, R Hermans, F Dubrulle, J Viala, J Bosq, M Mack, M Depondt, C Mattelaer, P Petit, P Champsaur, S Riehm, Y Dadashitazehozi, T de Jaegere, G Marchal, D Chevalier, L Lemaitre, C Kubiak, R Helmberger, P Halimi.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical usefulness of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) MR contrast media (Sinerem, Guerbet Laboratories, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France) with precontrast MRI in the diagnosis of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, using histology as gold standard. Eighty-one previously untreated patients were enrolled in a multicenter phase-III clinical trial. All patients had a noncontrast MR, a Sinerem MR, and surgery within a period of 15 days. The MR exams were analyzed both on site and by two independent radiologists (centralized readers). Correlation between histology and imaging was done per lymph node groups, and per individual lymph nodes when the short axis was > or = 10 mm. For individual lymph nodes, Sinerem MR showed a high sensitivity (> or = 88%) and specificity (> or = 77%). For lymph node groups, the sensitivity was > or = 59% and specificity > or = 81%. False-positive results were partially due to inflammatory nodes; false-negative results from the presence of undetected micrometastases. Errors of interpretation were also related to motion and/or susceptibility artifacts and problems of zone assignment. Sinerem MR had a negative predictive value (NPV) > or = 90% and a positive predictive value (PPV) > or = 51%. The specificity and PPV of Sinerem MR were better than those of precontrast MR. Precontrast MR showed an unexpectedly high sensitivity and NPV which were not increased with Sinerem MR. The potential contribution of Sinerem MR still remains limited by technical problems regarding motion and susceptibility artifacts and spatial resolution. It is also noteworthy that logistical problems, which could reduce the practical value of Sinerem MR, will be minimized in the future since Sinerem MR alone performed as good as the combination of precontrast and Sinerem MR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11976854     DOI: 10.1007/s003300101130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  28 in total

1.  Iron-oxide-enhanced MR lymphography: just a new toy or a breakthrough?

Authors:  B Hamm
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Imaging the lymphatic system: possibilities and clinical applications.

Authors:  Olivier Clément; Alain Luciani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Non-invasive imaging modalities for preoperative axillary lymph node staging in patients with breast cancer].

Authors:  K Wasser; A Schnitzer; J Brade; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Head and neck cancer: how imaging predicts treatment outcome.

Authors:  Robert Hermans
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 5.  [Macrophage specific MRI imaging for antigen induced arthritides. A potential new strategy for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  G H Simon; H E Daldrup-Link; E J Rummeny
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cervical lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Nermin Yehia Soliman; Sahar Elkhamary; Mousa K Alsharaway; Ali Tawfik
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Diagnostic accuracy and additional value of diffusion-weighted imaging for discrimination of malignant cervical lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  R B J de Bondt; M C Hoeberigs; P J Nelemans; W M L L G Deserno; C Peutz-Kootstra; B Kremer; R G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging of neck lymph nodes using 2D-single-shot interleaved multiple inner volume imaging diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging at 3T.

Authors:  J K Park; S-E Kim; G S Trieman; D Parker; E-K Jeong
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  The association of lymph node volume with cervical metastatic lesions in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Ming-Tai Liang; Clayton Chi-Chang Chen; Ching-Ping Wang; Chen-Chi Wang; Whe-Dar Lin; Shih-An Liu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 10.  Contemporary management of cancer of the oral cavity.

Authors:  Eric M Genden; Alfio Ferlito; Carl E Silver; Robert P Takes; Carlos Suárez; Randall P Owen; Missak Haigentz; Sandro J Stoeckli; Ashok R Shaha; Alexander D Rapidis; Juan Pablo Rodrigo; Alessandra Rinaldo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.