Literature DB >> 11976829

Change in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behavior of gemcitabine in human tumor xenografts upon entrapment in vesicular phospholipid gels.

R Moog1, A M Burger, M Brandl, J Schüler, R Schubert, C Unger, H H Fiebig, U Massing.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The in vivo pharmacokinetics (PK), biodistribution and antitumor activity of a new liposomal formulation of gemcitabine (GemLip) were compared to the conventional (clinical) formulation of gemcitabine (GemConv).
METHODS: Gemcitabine was entrapped in a vesicular phospholipid gel (VPG) consisting of densely packed liposomes. Redispersed VPG containing GemLip consisted of 33% liposomally entrapped and 67% free gemcitabine. The in vivo efficacies of GemLip and GemConv were compared using the subcutaneously growing human soft tissue sarcoma SXF 1301 and the orthotopically growing human bladder cancer BXF 1299T. PK and biodistribution were evaluated using radiolabeled drug and lipid in SXF 1301 tumor-bearing nude mice.
RESULTS: GemLip was highly active in SXF 1301 at a gemcitabine dose of 6-9 mg/kg (days 1, 8 and 15; dose near the MTD). In the 6-mg/kg groups, complete tumor remissions were observed in seven of eight mice. Equimolar doses of GemConv resulted in only moderate tumor growth inhibition. Even at equitoxic doses (360 mg/kg given on days 1, 8 and 15, or 120 mg/kg on days 1, 5 and 8) GemConv was less active than GemLip. Furthermore, GemLip was active in the orthotopically growing BXF 1299T bladder cancer model at 6 mg/kg and prevented distant organ metastasis. In the PK study, GemLip achieved a 35-fold higher plasma AUC (1680 mg x h/ml) than GemConv (47.6 mg x h/ml). The serum half-lives were 0.15 h for free gemcitabine and 13.3 h for liposomal gemcitabine (6 mg/kg each i.v.). Moreover, gemcitabine levels in tumors were fourfold higher following injection of GemLip than following injection of GemConv.
CONCLUSIONS: GemLip is a highly effective gemcitabine delivery system which results in superior gemcitabine pharmacodynamics and PK than GemConv. The enhanced in vivo efficacy might be explained by sustained release and passive tumor targeting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11976829     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-002-0428-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  18 in total

1.  EGFR-Targeted Polymeric Mixed Micelles Carrying Gemcitabine for Treating Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Goutam Mondal; Virender Kumar; Surendra K Shukla; Pankaj K Singh; Ram I Mahato
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 6.988

2.  Core-shell nanoparticulate formulation of gemcitabine: lyophilization, stability studies, and in vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Deepak Chitkara; Anupama Mittal; Ram I Mahato; Neeraj Kumar
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.617

3.  Chitosan and glyceryl monooleate nanostructures containing gemcitabine: potential delivery system for pancreatic cancer treatment.

Authors:  William J Trickler; Jatin Khurana; Ankita A Nagvekar; Alekha K Dash
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  Multifunctional polymersomes for cytosolic delivery of gemcitabine and doxorubicin to cancer cells.

Authors:  Rahul Nahire; Manas K Haldar; Shirshendu Paul; Avinash H Ambre; Varsha Meghnani; Buddhadev Layek; Kalpana S Katti; Kara N Gange; Jagdish Singh; Kausik Sarkar; Sanku Mallik
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Combinatorial therapies improve the therapeutic efficacy of nanoliposomal ceramide for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Yixing Jiang; Nicole A DiVittore; James M Kaiser; Sriram S Shanmugavelandy; Jennifer L Fritz; Yasser Heakal; Hephzibah Rani S Tagaram; Hua Cheng; Myles C Cabot; Kevin F Staveley-O'Carroll; Melissa A Tran; Todd E Fox; Brian M Barth; Mark Kester
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.742

6.  Modular polymer-caged nanobins as a theranostic platform with enhanced magnetic resonance relaxivity and pH-responsive drug release.

Authors:  Sang-Min Lee; Ying Song; Bong Jin Hong; Keith W MacRenaris; Daniel J Mastarone; Thomas V O'Halloran; Thomas J Meade; SonBinh T Nguyen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  Anti-metastatic effects of liposomal gemcitabine in a human orthotopic LNCaP prostate cancer xenograft model.

Authors:  Peter Jantscheff; Vittorio Ziroli; Norbert Esser; Ralph Graeser; Jessica Kluth; Alena Sukolinskaya; Lenka A Taylor; Clemens Unger; Ulrich Massing
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 5.150

8.  Synergetic anticancer effect of combined gemcitabine and photodynamic therapy on pancreatic cancer in vivo.

Authors:  Qi Xie; Lin Jia; Yan-Hong Liu; Cheng-Gang Wei
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Gemcitabine treatment of rat soft tissue sarcoma with phosphatidyldiglycerol-based thermosensitive liposomes.

Authors:  Simone Limmer; Jasmin Hahn; Rebecca Schmidt; Kirsten Wachholz; Anja Zengerle; Katharina Lechner; Hansjörg Eibl; Rolf D Issels; Martin Hossann; Lars H Lindner
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Non-PEGylated liposomes for convection-enhanced delivery of topotecan and gadodiamide in malignant glioma: initial experience.

Authors:  Amy Y Grahn; Krystof S Bankiewicz; Millicent Dugich-Djordjevic; John R Bringas; Piotr Hadaczek; Greg A Johnson; Simon Eastman; Matthias Luz
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.