BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy on blood glucose control of continuous peritoneal insulin infusion from implantable pump (CPII) compared with continuous subcutaneous infusion using insulin lispro (CSII-IL) in type 1 diabetic patients. METHODS: Fourteen type 1 diabetic patients (5 males and 9 women, age 50.6 +/- 12.8, diabetes duration 28.0 +/- 13.4 years) were treated with CSII-IL and CPII. Capillary blood glucose (BG) was monitored and recorded at least 4 times per day during 2 study periods of 45 days: using CSII-IL (period A), and from 45th to 90th day after implantation (period B). HbA1C was measured at the end of each period. RESULTS: Both daily BG levels (145 +/- 18 vs 153 +/- 17 mg/dl, p<0.01) and preprandial BG levels (139 +/- 20 vs 147 +/- 22 mg/dl, p<0.05) were lower in period B. Although postprandial BG values tended to be lower in period B, this reduction did not reach statistical significance (149 +/- 20 vs 157 +/- 16 mg/dl, p=0.07). Meanwhile, SD of all BG values was lower with CPII (69 +/- 11 vs 79 +/- 17 mg/dl, p<0.01) and HbA1c levels were lower at the end of period B (7.3 +/- 0.9 vs 7.8 +/- 0.9%, p=0.04). Low blood glucose index was comparable during both periods (2.8 +/- 1.6 vs 3.1 +/- 1.5, p=0.4). CONCLUSION: CPII may provide a better BG control and stability than CSII-IL. However, a long-term randomized prospective study is needed to confirm these improvements.
BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy on blood glucose control of continuous peritoneal insulin infusion from implantable pump (CPII) compared with continuous subcutaneous infusion using insulin lispro (CSII-IL) in type 1 diabeticpatients. METHODS: Fourteen type 1 diabeticpatients (5 males and 9 women, age 50.6 +/- 12.8, diabetes duration 28.0 +/- 13.4 years) were treated with CSII-IL and CPII. Capillary blood glucose (BG) was monitored and recorded at least 4 times per day during 2 study periods of 45 days: using CSII-IL (period A), and from 45th to 90th day after implantation (period B). HbA1C was measured at the end of each period. RESULTS: Both daily BG levels (145 +/- 18 vs 153 +/- 17 mg/dl, p<0.01) and preprandial BG levels (139 +/- 20 vs 147 +/- 22 mg/dl, p<0.05) were lower in period B. Although postprandial BG values tended to be lower in period B, this reduction did not reach statistical significance (149 +/- 20 vs 157 +/- 16 mg/dl, p=0.07). Meanwhile, SD of all BG values was lower with CPII (69 +/- 11 vs 79 +/- 17 mg/dl, p<0.01) and HbA1c levels were lower at the end of period B (7.3 +/- 0.9 vs 7.8 +/- 0.9%, p=0.04). Low blood glucose index was comparable during both periods (2.8 +/- 1.6 vs 3.1 +/- 1.5, p=0.4). CONCLUSION: CPII may provide a better BG control and stability than CSII-IL. However, a long-term randomized prospective study is needed to confirm these improvements.
Authors: Susan J Logtenberg; Nanne Kleefstra; Sebastiaan T Houweling; Klaas H Groenier; Reinold O Gans; Evert van Ballegooie; Henk J Bilo Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-05-08 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Peter R van Dijk; Susan J J Logtenberg; Klaas H Groenier; Rijk O B Gans; Nanne Kleefstra; Henk Jg Bilo Journal: BMC Endocr Disord Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 2.763
Authors: Ilze Dirnena-Fusini; Marte Kierulf Åm; Anders Lyngvi Fougner; Sven Magnus Carlsen; Sverre Christian Christiansen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-04-13 Impact factor: 3.240