BACKGROUND: Recent findings have cast doubt on the hypothesis that high intakes of fruit and vegetables are associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: In a large prospective cohort of women, we examined the association between fruit and vegetable intakes and colorectal cancer. DESIGN: Between 1987 and 1989, 45490 women with no history of colorectal cancer satisfactorily completed a 62-item Block-National Cancer Institute food-frequency questionnaire. During 386142 person-years of follow-up, 314 women reported incident colorectal cancer, searches of the National Death Index identified an additional 106 colorectal cancers, and a match with state registries identified another 65 colorectal cancers for a total of 485 cases. We used Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to estimate the relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs in both energy-adjusted and fully adjusted models. RESULTS: In models using the multivariate nutrient-density model of energy adjustment, RRs for increasing quintile of fruit consumption indicated no significant association with colorectal cancer [RR (95% CI)]: 1.00 (reference), 0.94 (0.70, 1.26), 0.85 (0.63, 1.15), 1.07 (0.81, 1.42), and 1.09 (0.82, 1.44). For vegetable consumption, there was also no significant association in the multivariate nutrient-density model with increasing quintiles of consumption: 1.00 (reference), 0.77 (0.58, 1.02), 0.83 (0.63, 1.10), 0.90 (0.69, 1.19), and 0.92 (0.70, 1.22). Additionally, 3 alternative models of energy adjustment showed no significant association between increases in vegetable intake and the risk of colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: Although the limitations of our study design and data merit consideration, this investigation provides little evidence of an association between fruit and vegetable intakes and colorectal cancer.
BACKGROUND: Recent findings have cast doubt on the hypothesis that high intakes of fruit and vegetables are associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: In a large prospective cohort of women, we examined the association between fruit and vegetable intakes and colorectal cancer. DESIGN: Between 1987 and 1989, 45490 women with no history of colorectal cancer satisfactorily completed a 62-item Block-National Cancer Institute food-frequency questionnaire. During 386142 person-years of follow-up, 314 women reported incident colorectal cancer, searches of the National Death Index identified an additional 106 colorectal cancers, and a match with state registries identified another 65 colorectal cancers for a total of 485 cases. We used Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to estimate the relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs in both energy-adjusted and fully adjusted models. RESULTS: In models using the multivariate nutrient-density model of energy adjustment, RRs for increasing quintile of fruit consumption indicated no significant association with colorectal cancer [RR (95% CI)]: 1.00 (reference), 0.94 (0.70, 1.26), 0.85 (0.63, 1.15), 1.07 (0.81, 1.42), and 1.09 (0.82, 1.44). For vegetable consumption, there was also no significant association in the multivariate nutrient-density model with increasing quintiles of consumption: 1.00 (reference), 0.77 (0.58, 1.02), 0.83 (0.63, 1.10), 0.90 (0.69, 1.19), and 0.92 (0.70, 1.22). Additionally, 3 alternative models of energy adjustment showed no significant association between increases in vegetable intake and the risk of colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: Although the limitations of our study design and data merit consideration, this investigation provides little evidence of an association between fruit and vegetable intakes and colorectal cancer.
Authors: Jennifer Irvin Vidrine; Diana W Stewart; Stephen C Stuyck; Jo Ann Ward; Amanda K Brown; Courtenay Smith; David W Wetter Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Todd M Gibson; Stephanie J Weinstein; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Albert R Hollenbeck; Amy F Subar; Arthur Schatzkin; Susan T Mayne; Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Ying Bao; Dominique S Michaud; Donna Spiegelman; Demetrius Albanes; Kristin E Anderson; Leslie Bernstein; Piet A van den Brandt; Dallas R English; Jo L Freudenheim; Charles S Fuchs; Graham G Giles; Edward Giovannucci; R Alexandra Goldbohm; Niclas Håkansson; Pamela L Horn-Ross; Eric J Jacobs; Cari M Kitahara; James R Marshall; Anthony B Miller; Kim Robien; Thomas E Rohan; Arthur Schatzkin; Victoria L Stevens; Rachael Z Stolzenberg-Solomon; Jarmo Virtamo; Alicja Wolk; Regina G Ziegler; Stephanie A Smith-Warner Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-10-27 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: M Ponz de Leon; P Benatti; F Borghi; M Pedroni; A Scarselli; C Di Gregorio; L Losi; A Viel; M Genuardi; G Abbati; G Rossi; M Menigatti; I Lamberti; G Ponti; L Roncucci Journal: Gut Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Kathryn E Wilson; Samantha M Harden; Fabio A Almeida; Wen You; Jennie L Hill; Cody Goessl; Paul A Estabrooks Journal: Psychol Assess Date: 2015-11-30
Authors: W J Louwman; M J Aarts; S Houterman; F J van Lenthe; J W W Coebergh; M L G Janssen-Heijnen Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 7.640