Literature DB >> 11975783

Student research projects and theses: should they be a requirement for medical school graduation?

W H Frishman1.   

Abstract

From 1981 to 1994, 69 fourth-year students at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine participated in a 6-month medical school research project (MSRP) with the same mentor. Students could choose an original project or library project, and were required to prepare a written report suitable for submission to a peer-reviewed journal. In this article, it is assessed whether a mandatory fourth-year MSRP might substitute for traditional clinical electives. Student reactions to the experience were ascertained by using the responses to an open- and closed-ended questionnaire regarding skills gained by doing MSRPs, the impact on their careers, and their relationship to the mentor. Eighty-nine percent of the students responded that MSRPs increased their ability to formulate a hypothesis, 91% reported that this project increased their ability to conduct a literature search, 95% felt that MSRPs increased their knowledge of research techniques, and 91% reported having improved data collection skills after completing these projects. Students also reported that MSRPs increased their ability to critically evaluate the literature (95%) or to work independently (93%), and 89% responded that the project improved their ability to evaluate their individual strengths and weaknesses. Eighty-nine percent reported that the project increased their ability to write a research paper (34% of projects were original research, 35% were literature reviews, and 30% both original research and literature reviews). Thirty-three percent of respondents reported having some kind of problem completing their projects, and 90% of project reports were accepted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. Ninety-one percent of students responded that they had received appropriate guidance from their mentor, and 73% met with him at least once a week. Seventy-three percent described a relationship with the mentor that went beyond project advising. Eighty-five percent responded that the project impacted their careers in medicine, 97% felt that the research experience was a useful replacement for fourth-year electives, and 91% felt they were as well prepared for residency training as their classmates who had regular fourth-year electives without research. Fifty percent of students indicated that completion of an independent research project should not be required for graduation, whereas 18% responded it should be a requirement and 32% were undecided. Incorporating an MSRP in the fourth year appears to increase research skills and is considered to be a useful replacement for traditional elective rotations. The MSRP impacts favorably on future careers; however, many students do not think it should be a mandatory requirement for graduation from medical school.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11975783     DOI: 10.1097/00132580-200105000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Dis        ISSN: 1521-737X


  44 in total

1.  The role of medical school admissions committees in the decline of physician-scientists.

Authors:  Eric G Neilson
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  ASCI Presidential Address: Mentoring and teaching clinical investigation.

Authors:  Kenneth Kaushansky
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Prolonged delays for research training in medical school are associated with poorer subsequent clinical knowledge.

Authors:  Liselotte N Dyrbye; Matthew R Thomas; Neena Natt; Charles H Rohren
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Student scientific inquiry in the core curriculum.

Authors:  Georgeta D Vaidean; Sandeep S Vansal; Ronnie J Moore; Stuart Feldman
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  A survey on the attitudes towards research in medical school.

Authors:  D Robert Siemens; Sanoj Punnen; James Wong; Nimira Kanji
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Challenges and opportunities for reinvigorating the physician-scientist pipeline.

Authors:  Dania Daye; Chirag B Patel; Jaimo Ahn; Freddy T Nguyen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Are medical students inclined to do research?".

Authors:  Rosmy Jimmy; Princy Louis Palatty; Prajna D'Silva; Manjunath Srinath Baliga; Abhimanyu Singh
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-12-15

8.  Perceptions, attitudes and practices toward research among senior medical students.

Authors:  Khalid M Alghamdi; Noura A Moussa; Dana S Alessa; Nermeen Alothimeen; Adwa S Al-Saud
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Celebrating 10 Years of Undergraduate Medical Education: A Student-Centered Evaluation of the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre--Determinants of Community Health Year 2 Program.

Authors:  E Fernando; A Jusko-Friedman; P Catton; J Nyhof-Young
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Undergraduate research involving human subjects should not be granted ethical approval unless it is likely to be of publishable quality.

Authors:  Cathal T Gallagher; Lisa J McDonald; Niamh P McCormack
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2014-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.