Literature DB >> 1197576

The effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine (DOET), d-amphetamine, and cocaine in rats trained with mescaline as a discriminative stimulus.

J C Winter.   

Abstract

The effects of mescaline (3,4,5-trimethoxyphenylethylamine), a hallucinogen, can function as a discriminative stimulus in appropriately trained rats. As a test of the hypothesis that those pharmacologic properties which distinguish hallucinogens and non-hallucinogens in man are reflected in distinctive stimuli in rats, the present experiments examined the effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine (DOET), d-amphetamine, and cocaine in rats trained with mescaline as a discriminative stimulus. Administration of a range of doses of DOM and DOET to subjects in which saline functioned as SD and mescaline as Sdelta revealed that a dose of 0.3 mg of either DOM or DOET was equivalent to the training dose of mescaline. When tested in rats in which mescaline served as SD, DOM and DOET were likewise found to mimic mescaline. In contrast, doses of d-amphetamine and cocaine (1 and 30 mg/kg, respectively) which were equivalent to the training dose of mescaline as Sdelta, did not result in responding appropriate for the mescaline condition when mescaline was trained as SD. When DOET (0.3 mg/kg) was substituted for saline as Sdelta, no evidence of discriminated responding was obtained in the course of 50 sessions. The present data, in conjunction with previous observations, suggest that those effects of mescaline in the rat which function as a discriminative stimulus are better correlated with pre-hallucinogenic LSD-like activity in man then with hallucinogenic activity per se. Thus, these effects in rats represent a necessary but not a sufficient condition for prediction of hallucinogenic activity in man.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1197576     DOI: 10.1007/bf00421179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacologia


  7 in total

1.  Psilocybin as a discriminative stimulus: lack of specificity in an animal behavior model for 'hallucinogens'.

Authors:  J Koerner; J B Appel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  The anxiolytic CRF(1) antagonist DMP696 fails to function as a discriminative stimulus and does not substitute for chlordiazepoxide in rats.

Authors:  Snjezana Lelas; Kim L Zeller; Kathryn A Ward; John F McElroy
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Animal models of serotonergic psychedelics.

Authors:  James B Hanks; Javier González-Maeso
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 4.418

4.  Comparison of the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine and amphetamine in rats.

Authors:  G D D'Mello; I P Stolerman
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  The discriminative stimulus properties of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM): differentiation from amphetamine.

Authors:  P B Silverman; B T Ho
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  MDA and DOM: substituted amphetamines that do not produce amphetamine-like discriminative stimuli in the rat.

Authors:  H E Shannon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Effects of the phenethylamine derivatives, BL-3912, fenfluramine, and Sch-12679, in rats trained with LSD as a discriminative stimulus.

Authors:  J C Winter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.