Literature DB >> 11974629

Health risk assessment of the translocation of wild animals.

F A Leighton1.   

Abstract

Potential health risks are always associated with the translocation of wild animals. A formal assessment of these health risks should be conducted in advance of each translocation, and the results of the risk assessment should be incorporated into decisions as to whether or not the translocation should occur or whether changes in the translocation protocol could substantially reduce health risks inherent in the translocation. Credible health risk assessments can be performed by individuals without extensive previous experience, given the necessary background in animal health and wildlife biology and access to sufficient valid information. Assessment of health risks should not be performed or influenced by those who will use the results to make decisions or those with vested interests in a particular outcome. The assessment process itself must be transparent, and the final risk assessment report must clearly present each step taken, all available information and all reasoning. Health risk assessment is a rigorous application of common sense to evaluate whether or not important health-related risks are associated with a proposed activity. The level of health risk inherent in a planned translocation is determined by identifying the full range of possible health hazards that might be associated with that translocation, identifying from among these a subset of potential hazards that require complete assessment, and for each hazard thus selected, evaluating the probability that the hazardous event will occur and the magnitude of negative consequences if it does occur. The combination of probability of occurrence and magnitude of consequences constitutes the risk posed by a potential health hazard, and the combined risk for each assessed health hazard constitutes the overall health risk estimate for the translocation. A valid numerical (quantitative) health risk assessment for wild animals is rarely possible because the available information on which the assessment must be based is too approximate and imprecise. Qualitative health risk assessments for wild animal translocations are usually of equal or greater value than numerical assessments and can be of enormous importance to wildlife conservation, domestic animal health and public health.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11974629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Sci Tech        ISSN: 0253-1933            Impact factor:   1.181


  13 in total

1.  Genomic Epidemiology and Management of Salmonella in Island Ecosystems Used for Takahe Conservation.

Authors:  Zoë L Grange; Patrick J Biggs; Shanna P Rose; Brett D Gartrell; Nicola J Nelson; Nigel P French
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Molecular characterization of Theileria species associated with mortality in four species of African antelopes.

Authors:  A M Nijhof; V Pillay; J Steyl; L Prozesky; W H Stoltsz; J A Lawrence; B L Penzhorn; F Jongejan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  A Comparison of Disease Risk Analysis Tools for Conservation Translocations.

Authors:  Antonia Eleanor Dalziel; Anthony W Sainsbury; Kate McInnes; Richard Jakob-Hoff; John G Ewen
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.464

4.  Migratory birds reinforce local circulation of avian influenza viruses.

Authors:  Josanne H Verhagen; Jacintha G B van Dijk; Oanh Vuong; Theo Bestebroer; Pascal Lexmond; Marcel Klaassen; Ron A M Fouchier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Occupancy modeling for improved accuracy and understanding of pathogen prevalence and dynamics.

Authors:  Michael E Colvin; James T Peterson; Michael L Kent; Carl B Schreck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Using Qualitative Disease Risk Analysis for Herpetofauna Conservation Translocations Transgressing Ecological and Geographical Barriers.

Authors:  Mariana Bobadilla Suarez; John G Ewen; Jim J Groombridge; K Beckmann; J Shotton; N Masters; T Hopkins; Anthony W Sainsbury
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.184

7.  Comparative health assessment of urban and non-urban free-ranging mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in southeastern British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Amélie Mathieu; Mark Flint; Patrick M Stent; Helen M Schwantje; Thomas E Wittum
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Parasites, Drugs and Captivity: Blastocystis-Microbiome Associations in Captive Water Voles.

Authors:  Emma L Betts; Sumaiya Hoque; Lucy Torbe; Jessica R Bailey; Hazel Ryan; Karen Toller; Vicki Breakell; Angus I Carpenter; Alex Diana; Eleni Matechou; Eleni Gentekaki; Anastasios D Tsaousis
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-22

9.  Physiology in conservation translocations.

Authors:  Esther Tarszisz; Christopher R Dickman; Adam J Munn
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.079

10.  Methods of Disease Risk Analysis in Wildlife Translocations for Conservation Purposes.

Authors:  Matt Hartley; Anthony Sainsbury
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.184

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.