Literature DB >> 11973164

The use of and preferences for the transesophageal echocardiogram and pulmonary artery catheter among cardiovascular anesthesiologists.

Michael J Jacka1, Marsha M Cohen, Teresa To, J Hugh Devitt, Robert Byrick.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), although widely used in anesthesia for cardiac and vascular surgery, remains controversial. Use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) by cardiovascular anesthesiologists may be a substitute or a preference compared with the PAC, but this has been incompletely investigated. An anonymous, cross-sectional survey was mailed to anesthesiologists in Canada and the United States. Anesthesiologists described their use of the PAC and TEE during cardiac and vascular surgery, along with their demographic characteristics. Two hundred sixty-five (77%) of 345 anesthesiologists responded. All had the PAC available for use, and 56% had TEE available. Only 23 (11% overall) reported having undergone echocardiography training, half of whom had completed fellowships. Both the PAC and TEE were more often used in cardiac valvular surgery (P = 0.0001) than in aortocoronary bypass or abdominal vascular surgery. Among all anesthesiologists, the PAC remained the preferred monitor in either cardiac or vascular surgery (P = 0.0001), although many indicated a preference for neither monitor. Among anesthesiologists with echocardiography training, TEE was preferred (P = 0.0004). We found that TEE was accessible to more than half of the surveyed anesthesiologists in cardiovascular surgery, but relatively few of them had completed formal training in its use. Only those with completed formal TEE training indicated a significant preference for TEE use and also used it frequently. Given the continuing controversy about the appropriate application of the PAC, concern about the appropriate application of TEE is prudent. The PAC remains the more frequently used and preferred monitor among cardiovascular anesthesiologists. IMPLICATIONS: A survey of anesthesiologists found that pulmonary artery catheter monitoring is currently more frequently used compared with transesophageal echocardiography during cardiac and vascular surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11973164     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200205000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  7 in total

1.  Continuous cardiac output monitoring after cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison with bolus thermodilution measurement.

Authors:  Karim Bendjelid; Nicolas Schütz; Peter M Suter; Jacques-Andre Romand
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Clinical practice in perioperative monitoring in adult cardiac surgery: is there a standard of care? Results from an national survey.

Authors:  Elena Bignami; Alessandro Belletti; Paola Moliterni; Elena Frati; Marcello Guarnieri; Luigi Tritapepe
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Safer cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Alan F Merry
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2009-12

4.  Vasoactive-inotropic score as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in adults after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Yumiko Yamazaki; Koji Oba; Yoshiro Matsui; Yuji Morimoto
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 5.  Which cardiac surgical patients can benefit from placement of a pulmonary artery catheter?

Authors:  Marco Ranucci
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas S Metkus; Dylan Thibault; Michael C Grant; Vinay Badhwar; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Jennifer Lawton; Sean M O'Brien; Vinod Thourani; Zachary K Wegermann; Brittany Zwischenberger; Robert Higgins
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 27.203

7.  Continuously assessed right ventricular end-diastolic volume as a marker of cardiac preload and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients.

Authors:  Christoph Wiesenack; Christoph Fiegl; Andreas Keyser; Sven Laule; Christopher Prasser; Cornelius Keyl
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.