Literature DB >> 11973014

The contribution of suggestibility and expectation to placebo analgesia phenomenon in an experimental setting.

Vilfredo De Pascalis1, Carmela Chiaradia, Eleonora Carotenuto.   

Abstract

This study reports how placebo analgesia was produced by conditioning whereby the intensity of electric stimulation was surreptitiously reduced in order to examine the contribution of psychological factors of suggestibility and expectancy on placebo analgesia. This strategy was used in order to manipulate expectancy for pain reduction. The magnitudes of the placebo effects were estimated after a manipulation procedure and during experimental trials in which stimulus intensities were reset to original baseline levels. Individual differences in suggestibility, verbal expectancy for drug efficacy and manipulation procedure for pain reduction were tested as possible mediators of placebo analgesia. The following dependent variables were measured: (a) subjective expectancy for drug efficacy in pain relief, (b) expected pain intensity and unpleasantness, (c) concurrent pain intensity and unpleasantness and (d) remembered pain intensity and unpleasantness. Statistically significant placebo effects on sensory and affective measures of pain were obtained independently of the extent of the surreptitious lowering of stimulus strength during manipulation trials. The pairing of placebo administration with painful stimulation was sufficient to produce a generalized placebo analgesic effect. However, verbal expectancy for drug efficacy and individual differences in suggestibility were found to contribute significantly to the magnitude of placebo analgesia. The highest placebo effect was shown by the most pronounced reductions in pain ratings in highly suggestible subjects who received suggestions presumed to elicit high expectancy for drug efficacy. The results also demonstrated that placebo effects established on remembered pain were at least twice as great as those obtained on concurrent placebo effects. This was mainly because baseline pain was remembered as being much more intense than it really was. Moreover, remembered placebo effects, like the concurrent placebo effects, were highly correlated with expected pain scores obtained just after manipulation trials. These results indicate that multiple factors contribute to the placebo effect, including suggestibility, expectancy and conditioning, and that the judgement of placebo analgesia is critically determined by whether pain relief is assessed concurrently or after treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11973014     DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00485-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  52 in total

1.  Acupuncture treatment in irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  A Schneider; P Enck; K Streitberger; C Weiland; S Bagheri; S Witte; H-C Friederich; W Herzog; S Zipfel
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Placebo effects in laser-evoked pain potentials.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Dagfinn Matre; Kenneth L Casey
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 7.217

Review 3.  Do the neural correlates of acupuncture and placebo effects differ?

Authors:  Rupali P Dhond; Norman Kettner; Vitaly Napadow
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 4.  Placebo analgesia: friend or foe?

Authors:  Donald D Price; Roger B Fillingim; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  Mechanisms and clinical implications of the placebo effect: is there a potential for the elderly? A mini-review.

Authors:  Ulrike Bingel; Luana Colloca; Lene Vase
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 5.140

6.  Placebo effects on human mu-opioid activity during pain.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; David J Scott; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Predicting individual differences in placebo analgesia: contributions of brain activity during anticipation and pain experience.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Lauren Y Atlas; Lauren A Leotti; James K Rilling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Understanding placebo and nocebo responses for pain management.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-06

9.  The Role of Heart Rate Variability in Mindfulness-Based Pain Relief.

Authors:  Adrienne L Adler-Neal; Christian E Waugh; Eric L Garland; Hossam A Shaltout; Debra I Diz; Fadel Zeidan
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.820

10.  Expectancy and Conditioning in Placebo Analgesia: Separate or Connected Processes?

Authors:  Irving Kirsch; Jian Kong; Pamela Sadler; Rosa Spaeth; Amanda Cook; Ted Kaptchuk; Randy Gollub
Journal:  Psychol Conscious (Wash D C)       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.