Literature DB >> 11972910

Bayesian framework for least-squares support vector machine classifiers, gaussian processes, and kernel Fisher discriminant analysis.

T Van Gestel1, J A K Suykens, G Lanckriet, A Lambrechts, B De Moor, J Vandewalle.   

Abstract

The Bayesian evidence framework has been successfully applied to the design of multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) in the work of MacKay. Nevertheless, the training of MLPs suffers from drawbacks like the nonconvex optimization problem and the choice of the number of hidden units. In support vector machines (SVMs) for classification, as introduced by Vapnik, a nonlinear decision boundary is obtained by mapping the input vector first in a nonlinear way to a high-dimensional kernel-induced feature space in which a linear large margin classifier is constructed. Practical expressions are formulated in the dual space in terms of the related kernel function, and the solution follows from a (convex) quadratic programming (QP) problem. In least-squares SVMs (LS-SVMs), the SVM problem formulation is modified by introducing a least-squares cost function and equality instead of inequality constraints, and the solution follows from a linear system in the dual space. Implicitly, the least-squares formulation corresponds to a regression formulation and is also related to kernel Fisher discriminant analysis. The least-squares regression formulation has advantages for deriving analytic expressions in a Bayesian evidence framework, in contrast to the classification formulations used, for example, in gaussian processes (GPs). The LS-SVM formulation has clear primal-dual interpretations, and without the bias term, one explicitly constructs a model that yields the same expressions as have been obtained with GPs for regression. In this article, the Bayesian evidence framework is combined with the LS-SVM classifier formulation. Starting from the feature space formulation, analytic expressions are obtained in the dual space on the different levels of Bayesian inference, while posterior class probabilities are obtained by marginalizing over the model parameters. Empirical results obtained on 10 public domain data sets show that the LS-SVM classifier designed within the Bayesian evidence framework consistently yields good generalization performances.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11972910     DOI: 10.1162/089976602753633411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  20 in total

1.  Molecular classification of brain tumor biopsies using solid-state magic angle spinning proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and robust classifiers.

Authors:  Ovidiu C Andronesi; Konstantinos D Blekas; Dionyssios Mintzopoulos; Loukas Astrakas; Peter M Black; A Aria Tzika
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.650

2.  Predicting Interrelated Alzheimer's Disease Outcomes via New Self-Learned Structured Low-Rank Model.

Authors:  Xiaoqian Wang; Kefei Liu; Jingwen Yan; Shannon L Risacher; Andrew J Saykin; Li Shen; Heng Huang
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2017-05-23

3.  hDirect-MAP: projection-free single-cell modeling of response to checkpoint immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yong Lu; Gang Xue; Ningbo Zheng; Kun Han; Wenzhong Yang; Rui-Sheng Wang; Lingyun Wu; Lance D Miller; Timothy Pardee; Pierre L Triozzi; Hui-Wen Lo; Kounosuke Watabe; Stephen T C Wong; Boris C Pasche; Wei Zhang; Guangxu Jin
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  Genome-wide selection by mixed model ridge regression and extensions based on geostatistical models.

Authors:  Torben Schulz-Streeck; Hans-Peter Piepho
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2010-03-31

5.  Polytomous diagnosis of ovarian tumors as benign, borderline, primary invasive or metastatic: development and validation of standard and kernel-based risk prediction models.

Authors:  Ben Van Calster; Lil Valentin; Caroline Van Holsbeke; Antonia C Testa; Tom Bourne; Sabine Van Huffel; Dirk Timmerman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  A decision support system to improve medical diagnosis using a combination of k-medoids clustering based attribute weighting and SVM.

Authors:  Musa Peker
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  A Strategy for the Effective Optimization of Pharmaceutical Formulations Based on Parameter-Optimized Support Vector Machine Model.

Authors:  Siqi Wang; Jianping Yang; Hengwei Chen; Kexin Chu; Xuefei Yu; Yaqiong Wei; Haixia Zhang; Mengjie Rui; Chunlai Feng
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.246

8.  A mathematical model for interpretable clinical decision support with applications in gynecology.

Authors:  Vanya M C A Van Belle; Ben Van Calster; Dirk Timmerman; Tom Bourne; Cecilia Bottomley; Lil Valentin; Patrick Neven; Sabine Van Huffel; Johan A K Suykens; Stephen Boyd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Multiproject-multicenter evaluation of automatic brain tumor classification by magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Juan M García-Gómez; Jan Luts; Margarida Julià-Sapé; Patrick Krooshof; Salvador Tortajada; Javier Vicente Robledo; Willem Melssen; Elies Fuster-García; Iván Olier; Geert Postma; Daniel Monleón; Angel Moreno-Torres; Jesús Pujol; Ana-Paula Candiota; M Carmen Martínez-Bisbal; Johan Suykens; Lutgarde Buydens; Bernardo Celda; Sabine Van Huffel; Carles Arús; Montserrat Robles
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  A comparison of two spelling Brain-Computer Interfaces based on visual P3 and SSVEP in Locked-In Syndrome.

Authors:  Adrien Combaz; Camille Chatelle; Arne Robben; Gertie Vanhoof; Ann Goeleven; Vincent Thijs; Marc M Van Hulle; Steven Laureys
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.