Literature DB >> 11972722

Managed care, access to mental health specialists, and outcomes among primary care patients with depressive symptoms.

David E Grembowski1, Diane Martin, Donald L Patrick, Paula Diehr, Wayne Katon, Barbara Williams, Ruth Engelberg, Louise Novak, Deborah Dickstein, Richard Deyo, Harold I Goldberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether managed care is associated with reduced access to mental health specialists and worse outcomes among primary care patients with depressive symptoms.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Offices of 261 primary physicians in private practice in Seattle. PATIENTS: Patients (N = 17,187) were screened in waiting rooms, enrolling 1,336 adults with depressive symptoms. Patients (n = 942) completed follow-up surveys at 1, 3, and 6 months. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: For each patient, the intensity of managed care was measured by the managedness of the patient's health plan, plan benefit indexes, presence or absence of a mental health carve-out, intensity of managed care in the patient's primary care office, physician financial incentives, and whether the physician read or used depression guidelines. Access measures were referral and actually seeing a mental health specialist. Outcomes were the Symptom Checklist for Depression, restricted activity days, and patient rating of care from primary physician. Approximately 23% of patients were referred to mental health specialists, and 38% saw a mental health specialist with or without referral. Managed care generally was not associated with a reduced likelihood of referral or seeing a mental health specialist. Patients in more-managed plans were less likely to be referred to a psychiatrist. Among low-income patients, a physician financial withhold for referral was associated with fewer mental health referrals. A physician productivity bonus was associated with greater access to mental health specialists. Depressive symptom and restricted activity day outcomes in more-managed health plans and offices were similar to or better than less-managed settings. Patients in more-managed offices had lower ratings of care from their primary physicians.
CONCLUSIONS: The intensity of managed care was generally not associated with access to mental health specialists. The small number of managed care strategies associated with reduced access were offset by other strategies associated with increased access. Consequently, no adverse health outcomes were detected, but lower patient ratings of care provided by their primary physicians were found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11972722      PMCID: PMC1495032          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10321.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  34 in total

1.  Some economics of mental health 'carve-outs'.

Authors:  R G Frank; H A Huskamp; T G McGuire; J P Newhouse
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1996-10

2.  Translating behavioral health services research into benefits policy.

Authors:  K L Grazier; H Pollack
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.929

3.  Provider choice and continuity for the treatment of depression.

Authors:  R Sturm; L S Meredith; K B Wells
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The impact of prior authorization on outpatient utilization in managed behavioral health plans.

Authors:  X Liu; R Sturm; B J Cuffel
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  Case-finding instruments for depression in primary care settings.

Authors:  C D Mulrow; J W Williams; M B Gerety; G Ramirez; O M Montiel; C Kerber
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Differences in 4-year health outcomes for elderly and poor, chronically ill patients treated in HMO and fee-for-service systems. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  J E Ware; M S Bayliss; W H Rogers; M Kosinski; A R Tarlov
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-10-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Organizational aspects of caring.

Authors:  R A Scott; L H Aiken; D Mechanic; J Moravcsik
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Collaborative management to achieve treatment guidelines. Impact on depression in primary care.

Authors:  W Katon; M Von Korff; E Lin; E Walker; G E Simon; T Bush; P Robinson; J Russo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-04-05       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Managed care and capitation in California: how do physicians at financial risk control their own utilization?

Authors:  E A Kerr; B S Mittman; R D Hays; A L Siu; B Leake; R H Brook
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Mental health care utilization in prepaid and fee-for-service plans among depressed patients in the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  R Sturm; C A Jackson; L S Meredith; W Yip; W G Manning; W H Rogers; K B Wells
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  23 in total

1.  The effects of health sector market factors and vulnerable group membership on access to alcohol, drug, and mental health care.

Authors:  Susan E Stockdale; Lingqi Tang; Lily Zhang; Thomas R Belin; Kenneth B Wells
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The challenge of integrated care for mental health: leaving the 50 minute hour and other sacred things.

Authors:  Andrew S Pomerantz; John A Corson; Mark J Detzer
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2009-01-31

3.  What drives referral from primary care physicians to mental health specialists? A randomized trial using actors portraying depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Richard L Kravitz; Peter Franks; Mitchell Feldman; Lisa S Meredith; Ladson Hinton; Carol Franz; Paul Duberstein; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Variables associated with general practitioners taking on patients with common mental disorders.

Authors:  Marie-Josée Fleury; Jean-Marie Bamvita; Lambert Farand; Jacques Tremblay
Journal:  Ment Health Fam Med       Date:  2008-09

5.  Value-based financially sustainable behavioral health components in patient-centered medical homes.

Authors:  Roger G Kathol; Frank Degruy; Bruce L Rollman
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Managed care, physician job satisfaction, and the quality of primary care.

Authors:  David Grembowski; David Paschane; Paula Diehr; Wayne Katon; Diane Martin; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  The relationship between treatment settings and diagnostic attributions of depression among African Americans.

Authors:  Tamara Scott; Robin Matsuyama; Briana Mezuk
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.238

8.  Accessing specialty behavioral health treatment in private health plans.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Merrick; Constance M Horgan; Deborah W Garnick; Sharon Reif; Maureen T Stewart
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 1.505

9.  Integrative internet-based depression prevention for adolescents: a randomized clinical trial in primary care for vulnerability and protective factors.

Authors:  Benjamin W Van Voorhees; Karen Vanderplough-Booth; Joshua Fogel; Tracy Gladstone; Carl Bell; Scott Stuart; Jackie Gollan; Nathan Bradford; Rocco Domanico; Blake Fagan; Ruth Ross; Jon Larson; Natalie Watson; Dave Paunesku; Stephanie Melkonian; Sachiko Kuwabara; Tim Holper; Nicholas Shank; Donald Saner; Amy Butler; Amy Chandler; Tina Louie; Cynthia Weinstein; Shannon Collins; Melinda Baldwin; Abigail Wassel; Mark A Reinecke
Journal:  J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2008-11

10.  Health reform and the Affordable Care Act: the importance of mental health treatment to achieving the triple aim.

Authors:  Wayne J Katon; Jürgen Unützer
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.