M L Chen1, H Y Tsen. 1. Department of Food Science, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.
Abstract
AIMS: To evaluate the possibility for discrimination of Bacillus cereus and B. thuringiensis using 16S rRNA and gyrB gene based PCR methods, and to obtain the sequences of the primer annealing sites so that the PCR results may be explained. METHODS AND RESULTS: Based on the sequence difference in the variable region (V1) of 16S rRNA and in the gyrB gene between B. cereus and B. thuringiensis, PCR primers specific to these Bacillus spp. were designed. When these primers were used to discriminate B. cereus and B. thuringiensis, six of 82 B. cereus strains were identified as B. thuringiensis while 67 of 73 B. thuringiensis strains were identified as B. cereus. Sequence analysis of the primer annealing sites showed that there is no clear-cut difference in the V1 region of 16S rRNA, and in the gyrB gene, between B. cereus and B. thuringiensis strains. CONCLUSIONS: Although 16S rDNA based probes and gyrB gene based PCR primers have been suggested for the discrimination of B. cereus and B. thuringiensis strains, when a large number of Bacillus strains was tested, results showed that discrimination between B. cereus and B. thuringiensis is difficult. Therefore, to distinguish B. thuringiensis from B. cereus, a single feature, such as the presence of a parasporal crystal protein or cry gene, may sometimes be reliable. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Discrimination between B. cereus and B. thuringiensis is a challenging debate to which this paper makes a contribution.
AIMS: To evaluate the possibility for discrimination of Bacillus cereus and B. thuringiensis using 16S rRNA and gyrB gene based PCR methods, and to obtain the sequences of the primer annealing sites so that the PCR results may be explained. METHODS AND RESULTS: Based on the sequence difference in the variable region (V1) of 16S rRNA and in the gyrB gene between B. cereus and B. thuringiensis, PCR primers specific to these Bacillus spp. were designed. When these primers were used to discriminate B. cereus and B. thuringiensis, six of 82 B. cereus strains were identified as B. thuringiensis while 67 of 73 B. thuringiensis strains were identified as B. cereus. Sequence analysis of the primer annealing sites showed that there is no clear-cut difference in the V1 region of 16S rRNA, and in the gyrB gene, between B. cereus and B. thuringiensis strains. CONCLUSIONS: Although 16S rDNA based probes and gyrB gene based PCR primers have been suggested for the discrimination of B. cereus and B. thuringiensis strains, when a large number of Bacillus strains was tested, results showed that discrimination between B. cereus and B. thuringiensis is difficult. Therefore, to distinguish B. thuringiensis from B. cereus, a single feature, such as the presence of a parasporal crystal protein or cry gene, may sometimes be reliable. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Discrimination between B. cereus and B. thuringiensis is a challenging debate to which this paper makes a contribution.
Authors: Johanna Maukonen; Jaana Mättö; Gun Wirtanen; Laura Raaska; Tiina Mattila-Sandholm; Maria Saarela Journal: J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol Date: 2003-05-23 Impact factor: 3.346
Authors: Leka Papazisi; David A Rasko; Shashikala Ratnayake; Geoff R Bock; Brian G Remortel; Lakshmi Appalla; Jia Liu; Tatiana Dracheva; John C Braisted; Shamira Shallom; Behnam Jarrahi; Erik Snesrud; Susie Ahn; Qiang Sun; Jennifer Rilstone; Ole Andreas Okstad; Anne-Brit Kolstø; Robert D Fleischmann; Scott N Peterson Journal: Genomics Date: 2011-04-05 Impact factor: 5.736
Authors: Deirdre L Church; Lorenzo Cerutti; Antoine Gürtler; Thomas Griener; Adrian Zelazny; Stefan Emler Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Sergei G Bavykin; Vladimir M Mikhailovich; Vladimir M Zakharyev; Yuri P Lysov; John J Kelly; Oleg S Alferov; Igor M Gavin; Alexander V Kukhtin; Joany Jackman; David A Stahl; Darrell Chandler; Andrei D Mirzabekov Journal: Chem Biol Interact Date: 2007-09-12 Impact factor: 5.192
Authors: Subbiah Poopathi; C Mani; K Thirugnanasambantham; V Lakshmi Praba; Niyaz Ahmad Ahangar; K Balagangadharan Journal: Parasitol Res Date: 2013-11-06 Impact factor: 2.289
Authors: Debora Frigi Rodrigues; Johan Goris; Tatiana Vishnivetskaya; David Gilichinsky; Michael F Thomashow; James M Tiedje Journal: Extremophiles Date: 2006-02-18 Impact factor: 2.395