Literature DB >> 11972399

The benefits of comprehensive surgical staging in the management of early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Tien Le1, Allyson Adolph, G V Krepart, R Lotocki, M S Heywood.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The management of understaged patients with apparent clinically early ovarian cancer is difficult. Options include offering chemotherapy based on histopathologic factors or reoperation to obtain the necessary information needed to assign an accurate surgical stage. This study aims to compare these two approaches and to define the role of staging surgery in this common patient population.
METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews were carried out at the Universities of Manitoba and Saskatchewan over the period 1975 to 1999. Demographic data and surgical findings were abstracted and entered into a computerized database for analysis. Patients not having surgical staging procedures were offered platinum-based chemotherapy based on high tumor grades, dense adhesions, and presence of surface excrescences or large necrotic areas. Patients with surgically proven stage I disease were treated with no further therapy regardless of histopathologic factors. Descriptive statistics are used to summarize the data. Logistic and Cox regression models are used to identify significant predicting factors for recurrences and progression-free intervals.
RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight patients presented with tumor macroscopically confined to the ovary at the time of laparotomy. The median age at presentation is 56.5 (18-90). The histology distribution was serous tumor in 28.3%, mucinous in 26.1%, endometrioid in 23.2%, clear cell in 14.5%, anaplastic in 2.2%, and mixed types in 5.8%. The grade distribution was 47.1% grade 1, 27.5% Grade 2, and 25.4% Grade 3. Sixty-eight percent of the patients had a comprehensive surgical staging procedure initially. Thirty-six percent of these patients were found to have extraovarian metastases and were subsequently treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Forty-three percent of those not having staging laparotomy were offered chemotherapy based on high risk factors only. At a median follow-up of 58 months. 77% of patients remained disease-free and 23% had recurrent disease. Of 60 patients with surgically proven stage I treated expectantly, 6 (10%) recurred, whereas of 25 unstaged patients treated expectantly due to lack of risk factors 7 (28%) recurred (P = 0.036). In patients treated expectantly, a significant survival advantage was noted in the staged group. Logistic regression showed age (OR 1.032, P = 0.043), high grade (OR 4.16, P = 0.003), and lack of a proper staging surgery (OR 2.62, P = 0.032) to be important factors predicting recurrence. In terms of progression-free interval, only age (OR 1.027, P = 0.048) and tumor grade (OR 3.62, P = 0.05) are significant predictors.
CONCLUSION: Absence of surgical pathologic high-risk factors is inferior to comprehensive staging laparotomy findings in guiding recommendations for subsequent adjuvant therapy. Patients who have not been properly staged stand a significant risk of recurrent disease despite more frequent use of chemotherapy. All clinically early-stage ovarian cancer patients should be considered for comprehensive staging surgery prior to further treatment recommendations. (c) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11972399     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  9 in total

1.  Patterns of care, predictors, and outcomes of chemotherapy in elderly women with early-stage uterine carcinosarcoma: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Gunjal Garg; Cecilia Yee; Kendra Schwartz; David G Mutch; Robert T Morris; Matthew A Powell
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Use and duration of chemotherapy and its impact on survival in early-stage ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Helen E Dinkelspiel; Ana I Tergas; Lilli A Zimmerman; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Ling Chen; Grace Hillyer; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Morphologic and Molecular Characteristics of Mixed Epithelial Ovarian Cancers.

Authors:  Robertson Mackenzie; Aline Talhouk; Sima Eshragh; Sherman Lau; Daphne Cheung; Christine Chow; Nhu Le; Linda S Cook; Nafisa Wilkinson; Jacqueline McDermott; Naveena Singh; Friedrich Kommoss; Jacobus Pfisterer; David G Huntsman; Martin Köbel; Stefan Kommoss; C Blake Gilks; Michael S Anglesio
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 4.  Operative management of primary epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Mario M Leitao; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  A rationale for neoadjuvant systemic treatment followed by surgical assessment and intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients presenting with non-surgically resectable ovarian or primary peritoneal cancers.

Authors:  Maurie Markman; Jerome Belinson
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 6.  Early events in ovarian oncogenesis.

Authors:  Dusica Cvetkovic
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 7.  Imaging and therapy of ovarian cancer: clinical application of nanoparticles and future perspectives.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Lorenzo; Giuseppe Ricci; Giovanni Maria Severini; Federico Romano; Stefania Biffi
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 11.556

8.  Prognostic impact of p16 and p53 gene expressions in stage 1a epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Emre Günakan; Yusuf Aytaç Tohma; Latife Atasoy Karakaş; Hüseyin Akıllı; Asuman Nihan Haberal; Ali Ayhan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2020-06-19

9.  Analysis of para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the level of the renal vessels in apparent early-stage ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Suk-Joon Chang; Robert E Bristow; Hee-Sug Ryu
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.401

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.