OBJECTIVES: Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) seems to be involved in critical steps of cancer onset and progression. Abnormalities of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Her-2/neu have been actively investigated in ovarian cancer and associated with unfavorable clinical outcome. The involvement of COX-2 in ErbB family pathways has been proposed. We investigated by immunohistochemistry the expression of COX-2, EGFR, and Her-2/neu in a series of advanced primary ovarian cancers. METHODS: The study included 76 consecutive stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer patients with measurable disease after first surgery. Immunohistochemistry was performed on paraffin-embedded sections with rabbit antiserum against COX-2, murine monoclonal antibody (MoAb) 300G9 against Her-2/neu, and monoclonal antibody 108 against EGFR. RESULTS: No association among COX-2, EGFR, and HER-2/neu was found. COX-2 positivity was found in a statistically significant higher percentage of unresponsive cases (80.0%) than in patients responding to chemotherapy (35.7%) (P = 0.0008). The association between COX-2 positivity and poor chance of response to treatment was retained in multivariate analysis. In the subgroup of patients who underwent explorative laparotomy COX-2-positive cases showed a shorter overall survival (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: COX-2 could represent a possible new marker of sensitivity to platin-based chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. The lack of association of COX-2 with EGFR or Her-2/neu suggests that the ability of COX-2 to predict tumor sensitivity to chemotherapy is not dependent on EGFR or Her-2/neu status and could be independently associated with prognosis. In this context, the availability of agents able to specifically interfere with COX-2, Her-2/neu, or EGFR tyrosine kinase is of potential interest. (c) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).
OBJECTIVES:Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) seems to be involved in critical steps of cancer onset and progression. Abnormalities of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Her-2/neu have been actively investigated in ovarian cancer and associated with unfavorable clinical outcome. The involvement of COX-2 in ErbB family pathways has been proposed. We investigated by immunohistochemistry the expression of COX-2, EGFR, and Her-2/neu in a series of advanced primary ovarian cancers. METHODS: The study included 76 consecutive stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancerpatients with measurable disease after first surgery. Immunohistochemistry was performed on paraffin-embedded sections with rabbit antiserum against COX-2, murine monoclonal antibody (MoAb) 300G9 against Her-2/neu, and monoclonal antibody 108 against EGFR. RESULTS: No association among COX-2, EGFR, and HER-2/neu was found. COX-2 positivity was found in a statistically significant higher percentage of unresponsive cases (80.0%) than in patients responding to chemotherapy (35.7%) (P = 0.0008). The association between COX-2 positivity and poor chance of response to treatment was retained in multivariate analysis. In the subgroup of patients who underwent explorative laparotomy COX-2-positive cases showed a shorter overall survival (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS:COX-2 could represent a possible new marker of sensitivity to platin-based chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. The lack of association of COX-2 with EGFR or Her-2/neu suggests that the ability of COX-2 to predict tumor sensitivity to chemotherapy is not dependent on EGFR or Her-2/neu status and could be independently associated with prognosis. In this context, the availability of agents able to specifically interfere with COX-2, Her-2/neu, or EGFR tyrosine kinase is of potential interest. (c) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).
Authors: Takiko Daikoku; Dingzhi Wang; Susanne Tranguch; Jason D Morrow; Sandra Orsulic; Raymond N DuBois; Sudhansu K Dey Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-05-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jason A Wilken; Tayf Badri; Sarah Cross; Rhoda Raji; Alessandro D Santin; Peter Schwartz; Adam J Branscum; Andre T Baron; Adam I Sakhitab; Nita J Maihle Journal: Future Med Chem Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 3.808
Authors: Heini Lassus; Harri Sihto; Arto Leminen; Heikki Joensuu; Jorma Isola; Nina N Nupponen; Ralf Butzow Journal: J Mol Med (Berl) Date: 2006-04-11 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Darren R Brenner; Dominique Scherer; Kenneth Muir; Joellen Schildkraut; Paolo Boffetta; Margaret R Spitz; Loic Le Marchand; Andrew T Chan; Ellen L Goode; Cornelia M Ulrich; Rayjean J Hung Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Doris R Siwak; Mark Carey; Bryan T Hennessy; Catherine T Nguyen; Mollianne J McGahren Murray; Laura Nolden; Gordon B Mills Journal: J Oncol Date: 2009-11-19 Impact factor: 4.375
Authors: C Elie; J F Geay; M Morcos; A Le Tourneau; V Girre; P Broët; B Marmey; L Chauvenet; J Audouin; E Pujade-Lauraine; S Camilleri-Broët Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-08-02 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: J Kupryjańczyk; R Madry; J Plisiecka-Hałasa; J Bar; E Kraszewska; I Ziółkowska; A Timorek; J Stelmachów; J Emerich; M Jedryka; A Płuzańska; I Rzepka-Górska; K Urbański; J Zieliński; J Markowska Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-11-29 Impact factor: 7.640