Literature DB >> 11972389

Functional outcomes and complications of continent urinary diversions in patients with gynecologic malignancies.

Pedro T Ramirez1, Susan C Modesitt, Mitchell Morris, Creighton L Edwards, Michael W Bevers, J Taylor Wharton, Judith K Wolf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review our experience with continent urinary diversions in patients with gynecologic malignancies and evaluate the presentation and management of early and late complications.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent a continent urinary diversion on the Gynecologic Oncology Service at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center during the period January 1988 to March 2001. We analyzed our data to evaluate potential risk factors for complications. Renal status, conduit integrity, and overall patient outcomes were also studied.
RESULTS: We identified 40 patients who underwent a continent urinary diversion using an ileocolonic segment (Miami pouch technique). All patients had a history of gynecologic malignancies. The median age at the time of the procedure was 50 years (range 24 to 76 years), and the median weight was 69.6 kg (range 47 to 125 kg). A total of 39 patients (98%) had a history of radiotherapy. Continent urinary diversion was performed as part of an anterior pelvic exenteration in 12 patients (30%), in conjunction with a total pelvic exenteration in 18 patients (45%), and as the main procedure in 10 patients (25%). The median estimated blood loss was 2100 ml (range 200 to 8500 ml). The median length of hospitalization was 19.5 days (range 7 to 56 days). A total of 24 patients (60.0%) had a postoperative complications unrelated to the reservoir. Complications directly related to the continent urinary diversion were seen in 26 (65.0%) of 40 patients. None of the patients in this study group developed chronic renal failure, and there were no perioperative deaths. At last evaluation, 36 (90%) of 40 patients reported normal continent conduit function.
CONCLUSIONS: Continent urinary diversion using an ileocolonic segment is a reasonable alternative to the ileal and transverse colon conduit in bladder reconstruction in patients undergoing radical pelvic surgery. The routine use of postoperative total parenteral nutrition, the chronic use of antibiotics after discharge from the hospital, and the routine use of imaging studies remain controversial. In this group of patients, the majority of complications may be successfully managed conservatively. (c) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11972389     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  3 in total

Review 1.  Locally Advanced Disease and Pelvic Exenterations.

Authors:  Christos Kontovounisios; Paris Tekkis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

2.  [Continent urinary diversion following anterior exenteration].

Authors:  R Stein; M G Kamal; P Rubenwolf; A Großmann; C Thomas; J W Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Postoperative outcomes after continent versus incontinent urinary diversion at the time of pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Anze Urh; Pamela T Soliman; Kathleen M Schmeler; Shannon Westin; Michael Frumovitz; Alpa M Nick; Bryan Fellman; Diana L Urbauer; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 5.482

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.