Literature DB >> 11971204

Musculoskeletal involvement of brucellosis in different age groups: a study of 195 cases.

Mehmet Faruk Geyik1, Ali Gür, Kemal Nas, Remzi Cevik, Jale Saraç, Bunyamin Dikici, Celal Ayaz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to determine the distribution and characteristics of arthritis in 195 patients with musculoskeletal involvement due to brucellosis in different age groups in the southeastern region of Turkey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 283 patients with brucellosis records and identified 195 with musculoskeletal involvement. Patients were classified into acutesubacute (<12 months) and chronic (>12 months) brucellosis. Patients were also classified into three age groups: <15 years old (group A), 15-45 years (group B), and over 45 years (group C). In addition, patients were classified into five subgroups according to type of arthritis: peripheral arthritis, polyarthritis, spondylitis, sacroiliitis, and spondylitis/sacroiliitis.
RESULTS: 195 (69%) of the 283 patients [138 female (49%), 145 male (51%)] had musculoskeletal involvement. Of the patients with musculoskeletal involvement 113 (58%) were female and 82 (42%) were male, ranging in age from 3 to 71 years (mean age 33.14 +/- 15.03). Of 195 patients studied, 39 (14%) were <15 years old (group A), 122 (43%) were aged 15-45 (group B), and 34 (12%) were over 45 (group C). The most commonly affected joints were the sacroiliac joint in 108 patients (55%), peripheral joints in 106 (54%), and spondylitis in 60 (31%). Of 108 patients with sacroiliitis, 19 were in group A, 76 in group B, and 13 in group C. Bilateral sacroiliitis was less common in group B (23 patients) than in groups A (3) and C (3) (p <0.05). Spondylitis was more common in group B (18%). Sacroiliitis and polyarthritis were more common than other types of musculoskeletal involvement in females, whereas in males the distribution of all types was similar. In patients aged under 15 and 15-45, sacroiliitis and polyarthritis were common compared with other types of arthritis, but the distribution was similar in patients over 45.
CONCLUSION: In southeastern Anatolia musculoskeletal involvement in brucellosis is frequent. The series presented suggests that musculoskeletal involvement in group A is higher than groups A and C. The prevalence of musculoskeletal involvement appears to differ according to age, sex and clinical type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11971204     DOI: 2002/07/smw-09900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly        ISSN: 0036-7672            Impact factor:   2.193


  38 in total

1.  Bacteremic and nonbacteremic brucellosis: clinical and laboratory observations.

Authors:  A Kadanali; K Ozden; U Altoparlak; A Erturk; M Parlak
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Cervical spondylitic myeloradiculopathy due to chronic brucellosis in a Ugandan teenager.

Authors:  P Kyebambe; R Kasyaba; S Nkakyekorera
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.927

3.  A case of acute septic arthritis hip caused by Brucella melitensis in an adolescent child.

Authors:  Divesh Jalan; Abhay Elhence; Poonam Elhence; Princi Jain
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-09-21

4.  Value of magnetic resonance imaging in brucellar spondylodiscitis.

Authors:  Xiaohui Yang; Qin Zhang; Xinghua Guo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Subclinical sacroiliitis in brucellosis. Clinical presentation and MRI findings.

Authors:  T A Gheita; S Sayed; G S Azkalany; H S El Fishawy; M A Aboul-Ezz; M H Shaaban; R H Bassyouni
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Brucellar spondylodiscitis: comparison of patients with and without abscesses.

Authors:  Figen Kaptan; Hakki Mustafa Gulduren; Aysegul Sarsilmaz; Hasan Kamil Sucu; Serap Ural; Ilknur Vardar; Nejat Ali Coskun
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  [How much do we know about human brucellosis?].

Authors:  D Soldo-Juresa; M Radman; N Laktasić; B Brkljacić; V Bozikov
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Rheumatologic manifestations of brucellosis.

Authors:  Behzad Heidari; Parham Heidari
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  Brucellar spondylitis.

Authors:  Hürrem Bodur; Ayse Erbay; Aylin Colpan; Esragül Akinci
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 2.631

10.  Possible brucellosis in an early hominin skeleton from sterkfontein, South Africa.

Authors:  Ruggero D'Anastasio; Bernhard Zipfel; Jacopo Moggi-Cecchi; Roscoe Stanyon; Luigi Capasso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.