Literature DB >> 11970661

Phase-field model for binary alloys.

S G Kim1, W T Kim, T Suzuki.   

Abstract

We present a phase-field model (PFM) for solidification in binary alloys, which is found from the phase-field model for a pure material by direct comparison of the variables for a pure material solidification and alloy solidification. The model appears to be equivalent with the Wheeler-Boettinger-McFadden (WBM) model [A.A. Wheeler, W. J. Boettinger, and G. B. McFadden, Phys. Rev. A 45, 7424 (1992)], but has a different definition of the free energy density for interfacial region. An extra potential originated from the free energy density definition in the WBM model disappears in this model. At a dilute solution limit, the model is reduced to the Tiaden et al. model [Physica D 115, 73 (1998)] for a binary alloy. A relationship between the phase-field mobility and the interface kinetics coefficient is derived at a thin-interface limit condition under an assumption of negligible diffusivity in the solid phase. For a dilute alloy, a steady-state solution of the concentration profile across the diffuse interface is obtained as a function of the interface velocity and the resultant partition coefficient is compared with the previous solute trapping model. For one dimensional steady-state solidification, where the classical sharp-interface model is exactly soluble, we perform numerical simulations of the phase-field model: At low interface velocity, the simulated results from the thin-interface PFM are in excellent agreement with the exact solutions. As the partition coefficient becomes close to unit at high interface velocities, whereas, the sharp-interface PFM yields the correct answer.

Year:  1999        PMID: 11970661     DOI: 10.1103/physreve.60.7186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics        ISSN: 1063-651X


  7 in total

1.  The OpenCalphad thermodynamic software interface.

Authors:  Bo Sundman; Ursula R Kattner; Christophe Sigli; Matthias Stratmann; Romain Le Tellier; Mauro Palumbo; Suzana G Fries
Journal:  Comput Mater Sci       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 2.  Phase-field modeling of microstructure evolutions in magnetic materials.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Koyama
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 8.090

3.  Uncertainty Quantification in Atomistic Modeling of Metals and Its Effect on Mesoscale and Continuum Modeling: A Review.

Authors:  Joshua J Gabriel; Noah H Paulson; Thien C Duong; Francesca Tavazza; Chandler A Becker; Santanu Chaudhuri; Marius Stan
Journal:  JOM (1989)       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  Analysis of transformation plasticity in steel using a finite element method coupled with a phase field model.

Authors:  Yi-Gil Cho; Jin-You Kim; Hoon-Hwe Cho; Pil-Ryung Cha; Dong-Woo Suh; Jae Kon Lee; Heung Nam Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Homogeneous nucleation and microstructure evolution in million-atom molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Yasushi Shibuta; Kanae Oguchi; Tomohiro Takaki; Munekazu Ohno
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Phase-Field Simulation of Grain Boundary Evolution In Microstructures Containing Second-Phase Particles with Heterogeneous Thermal Properties.

Authors:  T F Flint; Y L Sun; Q Xiong; M C Smith; J A Francis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The origin and stability of nanostructural hierarchy in crystalline solids.

Authors:  S Meher; L K Aagesen; M C Carroll; T M Pollock; L J Carroll
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 14.136

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.