M Hotopf1, J Chidgey, J Addington-Hall, K Lan Ly. 1. Division of Psychological Medicine, Guy's King's and St. Thomas' School of Medicine, and Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, 103 Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AZ, UK. m.hotopf@iop.kcl.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify all literature regarding depression in patients with advanced cancer and among mixed hospice populations, and to summarise the prevalence of depression according to different definitions. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using extensive electronic and hand searches. All studies with quantitative data on prevalence of depression were included and categorised according to their definition of depression. RESULTS: We identified 46 eligible studies giving information on the prevalence of depression, and a further four which gave information on case finding. The most widely used assessment of depression was the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), which gave a median prevalence of 'definite depression' (i.e., a score on the depression subscale of > 10) of 29%, (interquartile range, IQR, 19.50-34.25%). Studies that used psychiatric interviews indicated a prevalence of major depressive disorder ranging from 5% to 26%, with a median of 15%. Studies were generally small (median sample size 88.5, IQR 50-108), had high numbers of nonresponders, and rarely gave confidence intervals for estimates of prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: Depression is a common problem in palliative care settings. The quality of much of the available research is poor, based on small samples of patients with very high nonparticipation rates. The clinical importance of depression is described in subsequent papers.
OBJECTIVE: To identify all literature regarding depression in patients with advanced cancer and among mixed hospice populations, and to summarise the prevalence of depression according to different definitions. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using extensive electronic and hand searches. All studies with quantitative data on prevalence of depression were included and categorised according to their definition of depression. RESULTS: We identified 46 eligible studies giving information on the prevalence of depression, and a further four which gave information on case finding. The most widely used assessment of depression was the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), which gave a median prevalence of 'definite depression' (i.e., a score on the depression subscale of > 10) of 29%, (interquartile range, IQR, 19.50-34.25%). Studies that used psychiatric interviews indicated a prevalence of major depressive disorder ranging from 5% to 26%, with a median of 15%. Studies were generally small (median sample size 88.5, IQR 50-108), had high numbers of nonresponders, and rarely gave confidence intervals for estimates of prevalence. CONCLUSIONS:Depression is a common problem in palliative care settings. The quality of much of the available research is poor, based on small samples of patients with very high nonparticipation rates. The clinical importance of depression is described in subsequent papers.
Authors: Franca Warmenhoven; Eric van Rijswijk; Elise van Hoogstraten; Karel van Spaendonck; Peter Lucassen; Judith Prins; Kris Vissers; Chris van Weel Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2012 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Donald M Lamkin; Susan K Lutgendorf; David Lubaroff; Anil K Sood; Terry G Beltz; Alan Kim Johnson Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2010-12-21 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil; Helena C Kraemer; Art Noda; Rudolf Moos; James Hallenbeck; Maria Webster; Jerome A Yesavage Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2005 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Lisa M Thornton; Anna O Levin; Caroline S Dorfman; Neha Godiwala; Carolyn Heitzmann; Barbara L Andersen Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 3.894