Literature DB >> 11968135

Senile plaques do not induce susceptibility effects in T2*-weighted MR microscopic images.

Marc Dhenain1, Nicolas Privat, Charles Duyckaerts, Russell E Jacobs.   

Abstract

Senile plaques are the hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease. They typically range from 16 to 150 microm in size with most less than 25 microm. Mechanisms by which they might affect MR contrast and thus be made visible in this imaging modality are still unknown. Plausibility studies suggested that they might have a different magnetic susceptibility than surrounding tissue. A large difference would cause the plaque and a relatively large volume of adjacent tissue to be hypo-intense in T2*-weighted MRI scans, thus causing them to appear larger than their actual sizes and perhaps visible even when their size is below the nominal resolution limit of the imaging experiment. To evaluate this hypothesis, formalin-fixed superior temporal gyrus samples obtained from two Alzheimer's disease and two control subjects were imaged using magnetic resonance microscopy at 11.7 T. Three dimensional T2*-weighted gradient echo images were recorded with an isotropic resolution of 23.4 microm. The imaging protocol was especially sensitive to susceptibility effects. Samples were then stained for amyloid and/or iron deposits. Hypo- and hyper-intense structures were clearly visible in MR images from all samples. Hyper-intense structures reflected fixative penetration within the vascular system. Almost all the hypo-intense structures were blood vessels. Their hypo-intense profile was probably caused by iron deposits associated with the cell aggregates that they contained. Only one hypo-intense spot could be matched with a plaque and this was one of the largest plaques in our samples. The remainder of the several hundred plaques were not visible in MR images. In histological slices the senile plaques were often larger than small blood vessels that were visible in the MR images. This suggests that susceptibility effects are not associated with senile plaques and do not provide a mechanism to differentiate them from surrounding tissue. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11968135     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  21 in total

1.  Regional differences in MRI detection of amyloid plaques in AD transgenic mouse brain.

Authors:  T M Wengenack; D A Reyes; G L Curran; B J Borowski; J Lin; G M Preboske; S S Holasek; E J Gilles; R Chamberlain; M Marjanska; C R Jack; M Garwood; J F Poduslo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Effect of cerebral amyloid angiopathy on brain iron, copper, and zinc in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Matthew Schrag; Andrew Crofton; Matthew Zabel; Arshad Jiffry; David Kirsch; April Dickson; Xiao Wen Mao; Harry V Vinters; Dylan W Domaille; Christopher J Chang; Wolff Kirsch
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.472

3.  Amyloid oligomer formation probed by water proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  J H Walton; R S Berry; F Despa
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Relationship between hippocampal atrophy and neuropathology markers: a 7T MRI validation study of the EADC-ADNI Harmonized Hippocampal Segmentation Protocol.

Authors:  Liana G Apostolova; Chris Zarow; Kristina Biado; Sona Hurtz; Marina Boccardi; Johanne Somme; Hedieh Honarpisheh; Anna E Blanken; Jenny Brook; Spencer Tung; Darrick Lo; Denise Ng; Jeffry R Alger; Harry V Vinters; Martina Bocchetta; Henri Duvernoy; Clifford R Jack; Giovanni B Frisoni
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 21.566

5.  In vivo magnetic resonance microimaging of individual amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's transgenic mice.

Authors:  Clifford R Jack; Thomas M Wengenack; Denise A Reyes; Michael Garwood; Geoffrey L Curran; Bret J Borowski; Joseph Lin; Gregory M Preboske; Silvina S Holasek; Gregor Adriany; Joseph F Poduslo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  In vivo measurement of plaque burden in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Arijitt Borthakur; Tamar Gur; Andrew J Wheaton; Matthew Corbo; John Q Trojanowski; Virginia M-Y Lee; Ravinder Reddy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Automated detection of amyloid-β-related cortical and subcortical signal changes in a transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease using high-field MRI.

Authors:  Stefan J Teipel; Evangelia Kaza; Stefan Hadlich; Alexandra Bauer; Thomas Brüning; Anne-Sophie Plath; Markus Krohn; Katja Scheffler; Lary C Walker; Martin Lotze; Jens Pahnke
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.472

Review 8.  APP transgenic mice: their use and limitations.

Authors:  Claudia Balducci; Gianluigi Forloni
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  Visualization of beta-amyloid plaques in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease using MR microscopy without contrast reagents.

Authors:  Sang-Pil Lee; Maria F Falangola; Ralph A Nixon; Karen Duff; Joseph A Helpern
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  MR microimaging of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease transgenic mice.

Authors:  Thomas M Wengenack; Clifford R Jack; Michael Garwood; Joseph F Poduslo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.