Literature DB >> 11967246

The impact of JNC-VI guidelines on treatment recommendations in the US population.

Paul Muntner1, Jiang He, Edward J Roccella, Paul K Whelton.   

Abstract

Using epidemiological and clinical trial evidence, the sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-VI) updated previous guidelines to suggest that in addition to blood pressure, decisions on initial treatment should emphasize absolute cardiovascular disease risk. We estimated the impact of using cardiovascular disease risk on treatment recommendations for the US population using data from 16 527 participants in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. In the US population > or =20 years of age, 36% (62 million) had high-normal blood pressure or greater (systolic/diastolic blood pressure > or =130 mm Hg/> or =85 mm Hg) or were taking antihypertensive medication. Of this population, 5.1% (3.2 million) were stratified into risk group A (no cardiovascular disease risk factors or prevalent cardiovascular disease), 66.3% (41.4 million) into risk group B (> or =1 major risk factor), and 28.6% (17.9 million) into risk group C (diabetes mellitus, clinical cardiovascular disease, target organ damage). Also, 26% of this group (16.2 million) had high-normal blood pressure and were in risk groups A or B, a context in which vigorous lifestyle modification is recommended in the JNC-VI guidelines. Additionally, 11% (7.0 million) had high-normal blood pressure (systolic/diastolic, 130 to 139 mm Hg/85 to 89 mm Hg, respectively) or stage-1 hypertension (140 to 159 mm Hg/90 to 99 mm Hg), and at least 1 factor, placing them in risk group C, but they were not currently on antihypertensive medication. JNC-VI, but not previous JNC guidelines, specifically recommends drug therapy as initial treatment for these patients. We conclude that JNC-VI refines cardiovascular risk and enfranchises more Americans to undertake more aggressive risk reduction maneuvers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11967246     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000013862.13962.1d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  9 in total

1.  On redefining hypertension.

Authors:  Michel Accad; Herbert L Fred
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2010

2.  The effect of screening for cardio-renal risk factors on drug use in the general population.

Authors:  Jarir Atthobari; Ron T Gansevoort; Sipke T Visser; Paul E de Jong; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Impact of common medications on serum total prostate-specific antigen levels: analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Steven L Chang; Lauren C Harshman; Joseph C Presti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Are we satisfied with the follow-up of hypertensive and chronic kidney disease patients in outpatient clinics?

Authors:  M Peppa; D Vlahakos
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.471

5.  Infant obesity and severe obesity growth patterns in the first two years of life.

Authors:  Lisaann S Gittner; Susan M Ludington-Hoe; Harold S Haller
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-04

6.  Comparative effectiveness of guidelines for the management of hyperlipidemia and hypertension for type 2 diabetes patients.

Authors:  Nilay D Shah; Jennifer Mason; Murat Kurt; Brian T Denton; Andrew J Schaefer; Victor M Montori; Steven A Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of Atorvastatin on Resting and Peak Exercise Blood Pressure among Normotensive Men and Women.

Authors:  Amanda L Zaleski; Marianne L Mentch; Linda S Pescatello; Beth A Taylor; Jeffrey A Capizzi; Adam S Grimaldi; Priscilla M Clarkson; Stephanie A Moeckel-Cole; Stuart R Chipkin; Justin Keadle; Charles Michael White; Paul D Thompson
Journal:  Cholesterol       Date:  2014-11-18

8.  Knowledge and attitudes of primary care physicians in the management of patients at risk for cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Hamidreza Doroodchi; Maziar Abdolrasulnia; Jill A Foster; Elyse Foster; Mintu P Turakhia; Kimberly A Skelding; Kiran Sagar; Linda L Casebeer
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Comprehensive lifestyle modification and blood pressure control: a review of the PREMIER trial.

Authors:  Heather L McGuire; Laura P Svetkey; David W Harsha; Patricia J Elmer; Patrick J Elmer; Lawrence J Appel; Jamy D Ard
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.738

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.