Literature DB >> 11964530

Determinants of recurrent toxicity-driven switches of highly active antiretroviral therapy. The ATHENA cohort.

Jeanne P Dieleman1, Marielle Jambroes, Inge C Gyssens, Miriam C J M Sturkenboom, Bruno H Ch Stricker, Wilhelmina M C Mulder, Frank de Wolf, Gerrit-Jan Weverling, Joep M A Lange, Peter Reiss, Kees Brinkman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Toxicity is the most important reason for premature switching of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). In order to optimize the benefit-risk ratio of HAART, guidelines for toxicity management are needed.
OBJECTIVE: An observational cohort study to estimate the incidence and identify determinants of toxicity-driven switches on second-line HAART after having switched first-line HAART despite successful viral suppression.
METHODS: Patients were selected from those in the ATHENA cohort (n = 2470) who switched the initial HIV protease inhibitor (PI)-containing HAART while plasma HIV-1 RNA was <or= 500 copies/ml (n = 775). One-year cumulative incidences of subsequent toxicity-driven switches and adjusted relative risks (RR) for potential determinants were calculated.
RESULTS: The 1-year cumulative incidence of toxicity-driven switches of the second regimen was 24% [95% confidence interval (CI), 21-28], mostly because of gastrointestinal toxicity and neuropathy. Those who had switched from first HAART because of toxicity were at an increased risk of a recurrent toxicity-driven switch (RR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.7-3.5). Switching from PI to nevirapine while continuing the other antiretroviral drugs was more protective against a subsequent switch because of further toxicity than changing to another PI-containing regimen (RR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.6).
CONCLUSIONS: As for first-line HAART, toxicity is responsible for the majority of switches during second-line HAART. Prior switching for toxicity increased the risk of having to switch the subsequent regimen for toxicity, but this risk is reduced when switching to nevirapine rather than to an alternative PI. The latter should be taken into account when designing toxicity-management guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11964530     DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200203290-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS        ISSN: 0269-9370            Impact factor:   4.177


  14 in total

Review 1.  Benefit-risk analysis : a brief review and proposed quantitative approaches.

Authors:  William L Holden
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Do non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors contribute to lipodystrophy?

Authors:  David Nolan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Changes to antiretroviral drug regimens during integrated TB-HIV treatment: results of the SAPiT trial.

Authors:  Anushka Naidoo; Kogieleum Naidoo; Nonhlanhla Yende-Zuma; Tanuja N Gengiah; Nesri Padayatchi; Andrew L Gray; Sheila Bamber; Gonasagrie Nair; Salim S Abdool Karim
Journal:  Antivir Ther       Date:  2013-10-31

Review 4.  Immunopathogenesis of oropharyngeal candidiasis in human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Authors:  Louis de Repentigny; Daniel Lewandowski; Paul Jolicoeur
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Prevalence of clinical symptoms associated with highly active antiretroviral therapy in the Women's Interagency HIV Study.

Authors:  Michael J Silverberg; Mary Elizabeth Gore; Audrey L French; Monica Gandhi; Marshall J Glesby; Andrea Kovacs; Tracey E Wilson; Mary A Young; Stephen J Gange
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-08-16       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 6.  Changing patterns in the neuropathogenesis of HIV during the HAART era.

Authors:  T D Langford; S L Letendre; G J Larrea; E Masliah
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.508

7.  Sociodemographic factors predict early discontinuation of HIV non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors.

Authors:  Shaheena Asad; Todd Hulgan; Stephen P Raffanti; Jim Daugherty; Wayne Ray; Timothy R Sterling
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Comparative gender analysis of the efficacy and safety of atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir at 96 weeks in the CASTLE study.

Authors:  Kathleen E Squires; Margaret Johnson; Rong Yang; Jonathan Uy; Louise Sheppard; Judith Absalon; Donnie McGrath
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Incidence and risk factors for liver enzyme elevation during highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-HCV co-infected patients: results from the Italian EPOKA-MASTER Cohort.

Authors:  Carlo Torti; Giuseppe Lapadula; Salvatore Casari; Massimo Puoti; Mark Nelson; Eugenia Quiros-Roldan; Daniele Bella; Giuseppe Pastore; Nicoletta Ladisa; Lorenzo Minoli; Giovanni Sotgiu; Francesco Mazzotta; Sergio Lo Caputo; Giovanni Di Perri; Gaetano Filice; Carmine Tinelli; Giampiero Carosi
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Toxicity-related antiretroviral drug treatment modifications in individuals starting therapy: a cohort analysis of time patterns, sex, and other risk factors.

Authors:  Marta Perović Mihanović; Najm S Haque; George W Rutherford; Šime Zekan; Josip Begovac
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2013-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.