Literature DB >> 11964271

How we diagnose and treat deep vein thrombosis.

Jack Hirsh1, Agnes Y Y Lee.   

Abstract

Making a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) requires both clinical assessment and objective testing because the clinical features are nonspecific and investigations can be either falsely positive or negative. The initial step in the diagnostic process is to stratify patients into high-, intermediate-, or low-risk categories using a validated clinical model. When the clinical probability is intermediate or high and the venous ultrasound result is positive, acute symptomatic DVT is confirmed. Similarly, when the probability is low and the ultrasound result is normal, DVT is ruled out. A low clinical probability combined with a negative D-dimer result can also be used to rule out DVT, thereby obviating the need for ultrasonography. In contrast, when the clinical assessment is discordant with the results of objective testing, serial venous ultrasonography or venography is required to confirm or refute a diagnosis of DVT. Once a patient is diagnosed with an acute DVT, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the agent of choice for initial therapy and oral anticoagulant therapy is the standard for long-term secondary prophylaxis. Therapy should continue for at least 3 months; the decision to continue treatment beyond 3 months is made by weighing the risks of recurrent thrombosis and anticoagulant-related bleeding, and is influenced by patient preference. Screening for associated thrombophilia is not indicated routinely, but should be performed in selected patients whose clinical features suggest an underlying hypercoagulable state. Several new anticoagulants with theoretical advantages over existing agents are undergoing evaluation in phase 3 studies in patients with venous thromboembolism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11964271     DOI: 10.1182/blood.v99.9.3102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  25 in total

1.  Long-term, low-intensity warfarin after idiopathic venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Daniel G Hackam
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  [Current controversies in the diagnosis and management of cerebral venous and dural sinus thrombosis].

Authors:  S Schwarz; M Daffertshofer; T Schwarz; D Georgiadis; R W Baumgartner; M Hennerici; C Groden
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  The long term clinical course of acute deep vein thrombosis of the arm: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paolo Prandoni; Enrico Bernardi; Antonio Marchiori; Anthonie W A Lensing; Martin H Prins; Sabina Villalta; Paola Bagatella; Donatella Sartor; Andrea Piccioli; Paolo Simioni; Antonio Pagnan; Antonio Girolami
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-15

4.  Diagnosis and management of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  David Liu; Erica Peterson; James Dooner; Mark Baerlocher; Leslie Zypchen; Joel Gagnon; Michael Delorme; Chad Kim Sing; Jason Wong; Randolph Guzman; Gavin Greenfield; Otto Moodley; Paul Yenson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  D-dimer testing: advantages and limitations in emergency medicine for managing acute venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Sergio Siragusa
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 6.  3' end mRNA processing: molecular mechanisms and implications for health and disease.

Authors:  Sven Danckwardt; Matthias W Hentze; Andreas E Kulozik
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Canadian consensus recommendations on the management of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Part 2: treatment.

Authors:  J C Easaw; M A Shea-Budgell; C M J Wu; P M Czaykowski; J Kassis; B Kuehl; H J Lim; M MacNeil; D Martinusen; P A McFarlane; E Meek; O Moodley; S Shivakumar; V Tagalakis; S Welch; P Kavan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 8.  RNA surveillance: molecular approaches in transcript quality control and their implications in clinical diseases.

Authors:  Karen C M Moraes
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 6.354

9.  Alterations in homeostasis after open surgery. A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  T Dedej; E Lamaj; N Marku; V Ostreni; S Bilali
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug

10.  Fibrinolytic and coagulation pathways after laparoscopic and open surgery: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Nikos Tsiminikakis; Elie Chouillard; Christos Tsigris; Theodoros Diamantis; Christine Bongiorni; Constantinos Ekonomou; C Antoniou; Ioannis Bramis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.