Literature DB >> 11961381

Obstetrics and perinatal outcome of adolescent nulliparous pregnant women.

Adel Abu-Heija1, Abdulhai Mohammed Ali, Sanna Al-Dakheil.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study obstetrics and perinatal outcome in nulliparous teenage singleton pregnancies at a referral teaching hospital in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia.
METHOD: All singleton births during 1996-2000 of nulliparous mothers aged < or =17 years at King Fahd University Hospital were reviewed (n = 102) and compared with births of a control group of nulliparous mothers aged 20-24 years who delivered during the same period (n = 102).
RESULTS: The incidence of nulliparous teenage pregnancies was 0.8%. As compared with women aged 20-24 years, women of 17 years or less were at higher risk of very preterm birth (p < 0.05). The 5-min Apgar scores were not different between the two groups. Babies born to younger mothers had a significantly lower birth weight than those born to older mothers (p < 0.001); the incidence of a low birth weight (<2,500 g) was significantly lower in the control group (p < 0.04). There were no significant differences in distribution of mode of delivery, admission to the special care baby unit, antenatal complications, cesarean section indications, perinatal mortality rate, and early neonatal complications between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The increase in the very preterm births and the subsequently lower birth weight observed in nulliparous teenage women suggest that the maternal age may be a risk factor for very preterm births and associated long-term hazards. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11961381     DOI: 10.1159/000053000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest        ISSN: 0378-7346            Impact factor:   2.031


  6 in total

1.  Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of teenage pregnant women attending a tertiary teaching hospital in oman.

Authors:  Rahma Al-Haddabi; Majeda Al-Bash; Nadia Al-Mabaihsi; Najla Al-Maqbali; Tamima Al-Dhughaishi; Adel Abu-Heija
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2014-11

2.  An investigation into utilising gestational body mass index as a screening tool for adverse birth outcomes and maternal morbidities in a group of pregnant women in Khayelitsha.

Authors:  Hr Davies; J Visser; M Tomlinson; Mj Rotheram-Borus; C Gissane; J Harwood; I LeRoux
Journal:  South Afr J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013

3.  Comparison of life quality of pregnant adolescents with that of pregnant adults in Turkey.

Authors:  Semiha Taşdemir; Elçin Balci; Osman Günay
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.384

4.  Is teenage pregnancy an obstetric risk in a welfare society? A population-based study in Finland, from 2006 to 2011.

Authors:  Suvi Leppälahti; Mika Gissler; Maarit Mentula; Oskari Heikinheimo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Can programmatic inputs improve adolescent mothers' access to maternal care in rural Bangladesh? Nine years of evidence from a cohort study.

Authors:  Aminur Rahman; Tahmina Begum; Anne Austin; Md Hasan; Nurul Alam; Iqbal Anwar; Surasak Taneepanichskul
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Is a randomised controlled trial of a maternity care intervention for pregnant adolescents possible? An Australian feasibility study.

Authors:  Jyai Allen; Helen Stapleton; Sally Tracy; Sue Kildea
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.