Literature DB >> 11960924

Modeling the energetics of 100-m running by using speed curves of world champions.

Laurent M Arsac1, Elio Locatelli.   

Abstract

The present study aims to assess energy demand and supply in 100-m sprint running. A mathematical model was used in which supply has two components, aerobic and anaerobic, and demand has three components, energy required to move forward (C), energy required to overcome air resistance (Caero), and energy required to change kinetic energy (Ckin). Supply and demand were equated by using assumed efficiency of converting metabolic to external work. The mathematical model uses instantaneous velocities registered by the 1997 International Association of Athletics Federations world champions at 100 m in men and women. Supply and demand components obtained in the male champion were (in J/kg) aerobic 30 (5%), anaerobic 607 (95%), C 400 (63%), Caero 83 (13%), Ckin 154 (24%). Comparatively, a model that uses the average velocity of the male and female 100-m champions overestimates Ckin by 37 and 44%, respectively, and underestimates Caero by 14%. We argued that such a model is not appropriate because Ckin and Caero are nonlinear functions of velocity. Neither height nor body mass seems to have any advantage in the energetics of sprint running.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11960924     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00754.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  22 in total

1.  Performance for short intermittent runs: active recovery vs. passive recovery.

Authors:  Grégory Dupont; Nicolas Blondel; Serge Berthoin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Mechanical determinants of 100-m sprint running performance.

Authors:  Jean-Benoît Morin; Muriel Bourdin; Pascal Edouard; Nicolas Peyrot; Pierre Samozino; Jean-René Lacour
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Sprint running performance: comparison between treadmill and field conditions.

Authors:  Jean-Benoît Morin; Pierrick Sève
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Gold Standard or Fool's Gold? The Efficacy of Displacement Variables as Indicators of Energy Expenditure in Team Sports.

Authors:  Ted Polglaze; Brian Dawson; Peter Peeling
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Sprint Running Performance Monitoring: Methodological and Practical Considerations.

Authors:  Thomas Haugen; Martin Buchheit
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Vmax estimate from three-parameter critical velocity models: validity and impact on 800 m running performance prediction.

Authors:  Laurent Bosquet; Antoine Duchene; François Lecot; Grégory Dupont; Luc Leger
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Describing and understanding pacing strategies during athletic competition.

Authors:  Chris R Abbiss; Paul B Laursen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Running versus strength-based warm-up: acute effects on isometric knee extension function.

Authors:  Olivier Girard; Yvan Carbonnel; Robin Candau; Grégoire Millet
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Influence of individual energy cost on running capacity in warm, humid environments.

Authors:  Laurent M Arsac; Veronique Deschodt-Arsac; Jean-René Lacour
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 10.  The energy cost of sprint running and the role of metabolic power in setting top performances.

Authors:  Pietro E di Prampero; Alberto Botter; Cristian Osgnach
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.