Literature DB >> 11960408

[The value of different spiral CT phases in the detection of liver metastases].

H R Portugaller1, R Stacher, G Komaz, M Aschauer, K A Hausegger, D H Szolar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the value of the non-contrast phase (NCP), hepatic-arterial phase (HAP) and portal-venous phases (PVP) for the detection of liver metastases by spiral CT.
METHODS: In order to detect liver metastases, 119 patients (58 women, 61 men; mean age: 62 years) underwent triphasic spiral CT (8 mm collimation, 12 mm table increment/rotation, 7 mm reconstruction increment). NCP, HAP (20 s delay) and PVP (70 s delay) scans were acquired (contrast medium injection rate: 4 ml/s). CT analysis comprised independent evaluation of the three scan series for detection and conspicuity of liver metastases (conspicuity score: 0 = not visible, 1 = barely visible, 2 = clearly visible, 3 = distinctly visible).
RESULTS: In 83 of the 119 patients, 478 liver metastases were detected (110 hypervascular and 368 hypovascular lesions). 285 (60 %) metastases were detected on NCP scans. Significantly more lesions were seen on HAP (n = 375, 78 %) and on PVP (n = 428, 90 %). No lesion was detected on NCP studies alone. For all detected metastases, mean conspicuity was 1.2 +/- 0.4 on NCP, 1.8 +/- 0.8 on HAP and 2.2 +/- 0.8 PVP. Hypervascular lesions were best seen on HAP with a conspicuity score of 2.0 +/- 0.8 versus 1.3 +/- 0.5 on NCP and 1.5 +/- 0.8 on PVP. Hypovascular lesions reached the highest conspicuity on PVP with 2.4 +/- 0.8 versus 1.2 +/- 0.4 on NCP and 1.7 +/- 0.7 on HAP.
CONCLUSION: For detection of liver metastases with spiral CT, contrast series seem to be sufficient. For tumors likely to seed hypervascular metastases, HAP scans should be applied in addition to the PVP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11960408     DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-25122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  4 in total

Review 1.  Liver metastases: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Vito Cantisani; Hektor Grazhdani; Cristina Fioravanti; Maria Rosignuolo; Fabrizio Calliada; Daniela Messineo; Maria Giulia Bernieri; Adriano Redler; Carlo Catalano; Ferdinando D'Ambrosio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Role of contrast enhanced ultrasonography in the assessment of hepatic metastases: A review.

Authors:  Lars Peter Skovgaard Larsen
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2010-01-27

3.  Simultaneous dual-contrast multi-phase liver imaging using spectral photon-counting computed tomography: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Daniela Muenzel; Heiner Daerr; Roland Proksa; Alexander A Fingerle; Felix K Kopp; Philippe Douek; Julia Herzen; Franz Pfeiffer; Ernst J Rummeny; Peter B Noël
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2017-12-22

4.  Contemporary Validation of a Nomogram Predicting Colon Cancer Recurrence, Revealing All-Stage Improved Outcomes.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Konishi; Yoshifumi Shimada; Meier Hsu; Iris H Wei; Emmanouil Pappou; J Joshua Smith; Garrett M Nash; José G Guillem; Philip B Paty; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Andrea Cercek; Rona Yaeger; Zsofia K Stadler; Neil H Segal; Anna Varghese; Leonard B Saltz; Jinru Shia; Efsevia Vakiani; Mithat Gönen; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2019-04-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.