Literature DB >> 11960227

Swallowing abnormalities in multiple sclerosis: correlation between videofluoroscopy and subjective symptoms.

W Wiesner1, S G Wetzel, L Kappos, M M Hoshi, U Witte, E W Radue, W Steinbrich.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate if subjective symptoms indicating an impaired deglutition correlate with videofluoroscopic findings in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Videofluoroscopic examinations of 18 MS patients were analyzed by a radiologist and a logopedist and compared with the symptoms of these patients. Four patients complained about permanent dysphagia. Six patients reported mild and intermittent difficulties in swallowing, but were asymptomatic at the time of videofluoroscopy. Eight patients had no symptoms regarding their deglutition. All patients ( n=4) who complained of permanent dysphagia showed aspiration. All patients ( n=6) with mild and intermittent difficulties in swallowing showed undercoating of the epiglottis and/or laryngeal penetration. Of those 8 patients without any swallowing symptoms, only 2 had a normal videofluoroscopy. Swallowing abnormalities seem to be much more frequent in patients with MS than generally believed and they may easily be missed clinically as long as the patients do not aspirate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11960227     DOI: 10.1007/s003300101086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  9 in total

Review 1.  Prevalence of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Guan; Hui Wang; Hai-Shan Huang; Ling Meng
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Electrophysiological Evaluation of Dysphagia in the Mild or Moderate Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Concept of Subclinical Dysphagia.

Authors:  Yesim Beckmann; Nevin Gürgör; Ahmet Çakır; Şehnaz Arıcı; Tülay Kurt İncesu; Yaprak Seçil; Cumhur Ertekin
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Symptomatic therapy in multiple sclerosis: a review for a multimodal approach in clinical practice.

Authors:  João Carlos Correia de Sa; Laura Airas; Emmanuel Bartholome; Nikolaos Grigoriadis; Heinrich Mattle; Celia Oreja-Guevara; Jonathan O'Riordan; Finn Sellebjerg; Bruno Stankoff; Karl Vass; Agata Walczak; Heinz Wiendl; Bernd C Kieseier
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 4.  Role of videofluoroscopy in evaluation of neurologic dysphagia.

Authors:  M G Rugiu
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  Prevalence and predictors of dysphagia in Iranian patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Maryam Tarameshlu; Amir Reza Azimi; Leila Ghelichi; Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2017-12-26

6.  Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Questionnaire for the Assessment of Dysphagia in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Elif Gökçe Tenekeci; BelgüZar Kara; Ahmet Çetiz; Şeref Demirkaya; Numan Demir; Cengizhan Açikel
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 1.339

Review 7.  Autoimmune Neurogenic Dysphagia.

Authors:  Panos Stathopoulos; Marinos C Dalakas
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 2.733

8.  Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the DYMUS questionnaire for the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Déborah S Sales; Regina Mp Alvarenga; Claudia Cf Vasconcelos; Roberta G Silva; Luiz Cs Thuler
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-07-22

9.  Oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with multiple sclerosis: do the disease classification scales reflect dysphagia severity?

Authors:  Alessandro Murano Ferré Fernandes; André de Campos Duprat; Cláudia Alessandra Eckley; Leonardo da Silva; Roberta Busch Ferreira; Charles Peter Tilbery
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.