Literature DB >> 11960003

Coping with crowds: density-dependent disease resistance in desert locusts.

Kenneth Wilson1, Matthew B Thomas, Simon Blanford, Matthew Doggett, Stephen J Simpson, Sarah L Moore.   

Abstract

Parasite transmission generally exhibits some form of positive density dependence. Thus, as population density increases, so too does the per capita risk of becoming infected. Under such circumstances, natural selection should favor individuals that use cues associated with population density to determine the optimal allocation of resources to disease resistance mechanisms. As a consequence, individuals experiencing crowded conditions are predicted to be more resistant to parasites and pathogens than those experiencing low-density conditions. This phenomenon (termed "density-dependent prophylaxis") [Wilson, K. & Reeson, A. F. (1998) Ecol. Entomol. 23, 100-101] is predicted to be particularly prevalent in outbreak pest species and in species exhibiting density-dependent phase polyphenism, such as the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. Here we show that, as predicted, desert locusts reared under crowded conditions are significantly more resistant than solitary locusts to the entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum, a key natural disease of acridids and an important agent in locust and grasshopper biocontrol. Moreover, enhanced pathogen resistance in crowded locusts is associated with elevated antimicrobial activity, but not with any difference in thermal preferences or behavioral fever response. These results have implications for understanding the development and biocontrol of locust plagues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11960003      PMCID: PMC122793          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.082461999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  17 in total

1.  Modelling density-dependent resistance in insect-pathogen interactions.

Authors:  K A White; K Wilson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Gregarious behavior in desert locusts is evoked by touching their back legs.

Authors:  S J Simpson; E Despland; B F Hägele; T Dodgson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Trade-off between parasitoid resistance and larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A R Kraaijeveld; H C Godfray
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Population biology of infectious diseases: Part I.

Authors:  R M Anderson; R M May
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1979-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Melanogenesis and the generation of cytotoxic molecules during insect cellular immune reactions.

Authors:  A J Nappi; E Vass
Journal:  Pigment Cell Res       Date:  1993-06

6.  Ultrastructural localization of phenoloxidase in the midgut of refractory Anopheles gambiae and association of the enzyme with encapsulated Plasmodium cynomolgi.

Authors:  S M Paskewitz; M R Brown; F H Collins; A O Lea
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 1.276

Review 7.  Biological control of locusts and grasshoppers.

Authors:  C J Lomer; R P Bateman; D L Johnson; J Langewald; M Thomas
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 19.686

8.  The role of female accessory glands in maternal inheritance of phase in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria.

Authors:  B F Hügele; V Oag; A Bouaïchi; A R McCaffery; S J Simpson
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.354

9.  The physiology of locust phase polymorphism: an update.

Authors:  M P. Pener; Yoram Yerushalmi
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.354

10.  Hemocyte load and immune resistance to Asobara tabida are correlated in species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup.

Authors:  G Prévost; P Eslin
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.354

View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  Variation in immune defence as a question of evolutionary ecology.

Authors:  Paul Schmid-Hempel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Trade-offs in group living: transmission and disease resistance in leaf-cutting ants.

Authors:  William O H Hughes; Jørgen Eilenberg; Jacobus J Boomsma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sex-specific response of a mosquito to parasites and crowding.

Authors:  Michelle Tseng
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Exposure to sexual signals during rearing increases immune defence in adult field crickets.

Authors:  Nathan W Bailey; Brian Gray; Marlene Zuk
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 5.  Developmental processes and the induction of cardiovascular function: conceptual aspects.

Authors:  Mark A Hanson; Peter D Gluckman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The analysis of large-scale gene expression correlated to the phase changes of the migratory locust.

Authors:  Le Kang; Xiangyong Chen; Yan Zhou; Bowan Liu; Wei Zheng; Ruiqiang Li; Jun Wang; Jun Yu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Flexible diet choice offsets protein costs of pathogen resistance in a caterpillar.

Authors:  K P Lee; J S Cory; K Wilson; D Raubenheimer; S J Simpson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Dietary-dependent trans-generational immune priming in an insect herbivore.

Authors:  Dalial Freitak; David G Heckel; Heiko Vogel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Rapid induction of immune density-dependent prophylaxis in adult social insects.

Authors:  Mario X Ruiz-González; Yannick Moret; Mark J F Brown
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Crowded locusts produce hatchlings vulnerable to fungal attack.

Authors:  Gabriel A Miller; Judith K Pell; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.