Literature DB >> 11958905

Palliative radiation for vertebral metastases: the effect of variation in prescription parameters on the dose received at depth.

Rachael Barton1, Graham Robinson, Eric Gutierrez, Peter Kirkbride, Michael McLean.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of prescription parameters on the dose received by the spine during palliative radiotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a survey, members of the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists were asked to define their prescription parameters for vertebral metastases. The depth of the spinal canal and vertebral body at 8 spinal levels was measured in 20 magnetic resonance imaging studies (MRIs). Survey results were applied to the measurements to assess the dose received at depth. The depth of spinal structures assessed at simulation and by diagnostic imaging was compared.
RESULTS: Prescriptions were most commonly to D(max) 3 cm or 5 cm using 60Co-6MV photons delivering 8-30 Gy in 1-10 fractions. Mean depths from MRI were: posterior spinal canal, 5.5 cm; anterior spinal canal, 6.9 cm; and anterior vertebral body, 9.6 cm. Application of the prescription parameters from the survey to these measurements showed a wide range in the dose at depth with variation in technique. Depths measured at simulation correlated well with diagnostic imaging.
CONCLUSION: The spinal canal and vertebral body lie >5 cm beneath the skin, and the dose received varies by up to 50% with changes in prescription depth. We suggest a suitable prescription point for vertebral metastases and a method for determining this at simulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11958905     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)02738-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

Review 1.  Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases from lung cancer: Evidence-based medicine?

Authors:  Alysa Fairchild
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

2.  European French-speaking study from the GEMO group on bone metastases management: a special focus on external beam radiotherapy practice survey.

Authors:  Nicolas Magné; Cyrus Chargari; René Olivier Mirimanoff; Pierre Olivier; Jean Philippe Vuillez; Michèle Tubiana-Hulin; Jean Jacques Body; Jean Léon Lagrange
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  A randomized controlled trial for evaluating pain response in patients with spinal metastases following local versus whole vertebral radiotherapy: study protocol for phase II clinical trial.

Authors:  Li Yuan; Lidan Geng; Danfeng Wu; Tangzhi Dai; Gang Feng; Xiaobo Du
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Comparing conVEntional RadioTherapy with stereotactIC body radiotherapy in patients with spinAL metastases: study protocol for an randomized controlled trial following the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design.

Authors:  Joanne M van der Velden; Helena M Verkooijen; Enrica Seravalli; Jochem Hes; A Sophie Gerlich; Nicolien Kasperts; Wietse S C Eppinga; Jorrit-Jan Verlaan; Marco van Vulpen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Effectiveness and toxicity of conventional radiotherapy treatment for painful spinal metastases: a detailed course of side effects after opposing fields versus a single posterior field technique.

Authors:  Paulien G Westhoff; Alexander de Graeff; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Ilse de Pree; Marco van Vulpen; Jan Willem H Leer; Corrie A M Marijnen; Yvette M van der Linden
Journal:  J Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-09-19

6.  Conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT): a safe and effective treatment for cancer spinal metastasis.

Authors:  Youling Gong; Jin Wang; Sen Bai; Xiaoqin Jiang; Feng Xu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.481

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.