Literature DB >> 11957168

Comparison of continuous, stat, and intermittent cardiac output measurements in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.

Ajmer Singh1, Rajiv Juneja, Yatin Mehta, Naresh Trehan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare intermittent cardiac output (ICO) with continuous cardiac output (CCO) and stat cardiac output (SCO) measurements in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery.
DESIGN: Prospective, clinical study.
SETTING: Single, tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty adult patients undergoing off-pump MIDCAB surgery from January through June 2000.
INTERVENTIONS: Each patient had a 7.5F 5-lumen pulmonary artery thermodilution catheter (CCO catheter, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Irvine, CA) inserted for measurement of cardiac output (CO). ICO, CCO, and SCO were compared at 10 predefined time points.
RESULTS: A total of 400 data pairs for CO were obtained. ICO values ranged from 1.8 to 8.4 L/min; CCO, 1.9 to 7.5 L/min; and SCO, 2.25 to 6.35 L/min. Correlation between ICO and CCO was significant (correlation coefficient, r = 0.78, p < 0.001), accompanied by a bias of -0.095 L/min and precision of 0.729 L/min. Similarly, the correlation between ICO and SCO was significant (r = 0.79, p < 0.001), accompanied by good accuracy (bias, 0.084 L/min) and precision (0.843 L/min). There were statistically significant decreases in mean arterial pressure, CO, cardiac index, stroke volume, stroke volume index, and left and right ventricular stroke work indices during anastomosis of the left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery. These parameters returned to baseline preinduction values 1 minute after completion of the anastomosis.
CONCLUSION: Excellent correlation, accuracy, and precision were found among the 3 methods of measuring CO in patients undergoing MIDCAB surgery. Further studies are needed to assess their accuracy in multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery and in patients with poor left ventricular function. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11957168     DOI: 10.1053/jcan.2002.31063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  9 in total

Review 1.  Methods in pharmacology: measurement of cardiac output.

Authors:  Bart F Geerts; Leon P Aarts; Jos R Jansen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Tracking changes in cardiac output: methodological considerations for the validation of monitoring devices.

Authors:  Pierre Squara; Maurizio Cecconi; Andrew Rhodes; Mervyn Singer; Jean-Daniel Chiche
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Newer methods of cardiac output monitoring.

Authors:  Yatin Mehta; Dheeraj Arora
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-26

4.  Transcardiac conductance for continuous measurement of left ventricular volume: validation vs. angiography in patients.

Authors:  Eva M Staal; Jan Baan; J Wouter Jukema; Ernst E van der Wall; Paul Steendijk
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Agreement between continuous and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution for cardiac output measurement in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karim Kouz; Frederic Michard; Alina Bergholz; Christina Vokuhl; Luisa Briesenick; Phillip Hoppe; Moritz Flick; Gerhard Schön; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Accuracy of cardiac output measurements during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: according to the vessel anastomosis sites.

Authors:  Sung Yong Park; Dae Hee Kim; Han Bum Joe; Ji Young Yoo; Jin Soo Kim; Min Kang; Yong Woo Hong
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-05-24

7.  Toward intelligent hemodynamic monitoring: a functional approach.

Authors:  Pierre Squara; Carl Waldmann
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 1.866

8.  The utilization spectrum of cardiac output monitoring devices among anesthesiology programs across Veterans Health Administration in the United States.

Authors:  Jahan Porhomayon; Leili Pourafkari; Ata Mahmoodpoor; Nader D Nader
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

9.  Hemodynamic evaluation by serial right heart catheterizations after cardiac arrest; protocol of a sub-study from the Blood Pressure and Oxygenation Targets after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest-trial (BOX).

Authors:  Johannes Grand; Christian Hassager; Henrik Schmidt; Jacob E Møller; Simon Mølstrøm; Benjamin Nyholm; Jesper Kjaergaard
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-12-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.