PURPOSE: We elucidated patient perception of the external genitalia after Martius flap harvesting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 8 women in whom a Martius interposition flap was used in association with transvaginal urethrolysis. Patients were contacted by an independent nurse and asked to evaluate the cosmetic appearance of the labium majus harvest site. They were also queried on any associated pain, numbness or altered sensation, or perceived interference with vaginal sexual relations. RESULTS: Of the 8 patients 2 (25%) believed that the harvest site appeared to be identical to its preoperative appearance, 2 (25%) believed that there were only minimal changes from the preoperative appearance, 1 (12%) believed that it appeared markedly different from the contralateral side and 3 (38%) stated that they had never performed self-examination. Of the 8 patients 1 (13%) complained of dyspareunia, 3 (38%) had intermittent discomfort in the harvest area 1 year after the operation and 5 (62%) perceived permanently decreased sensation or numbness at the harvest site. CONCLUSIONS: The Martius flap is not associated with a significant amount of perceived cosmetic disfigurement. It has relatively little effect on sexual relations. Postoperatively discomfort is minimal but there may be associated numbness or decreased sensation at the harvest site.
PURPOSE: We elucidated patient perception of the external genitalia after Martius flap harvesting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 8 women in whom a Martius interposition flap was used in association with transvaginal urethrolysis. Patients were contacted by an independent nurse and asked to evaluate the cosmetic appearance of the labium majus harvest site. They were also queried on any associated pain, numbness or altered sensation, or perceived interference with vaginal sexual relations. RESULTS: Of the 8 patients 2 (25%) believed that the harvest site appeared to be identical to its preoperative appearance, 2 (25%) believed that there were only minimal changes from the preoperative appearance, 1 (12%) believed that it appeared markedly different from the contralateral side and 3 (38%) stated that they had never performed self-examination. Of the 8 patients 1 (13%) complained of dyspareunia, 3 (38%) had intermittent discomfort in the harvest area 1 year after the operation and 5 (62%) perceived permanently decreased sensation or numbness at the harvest site. CONCLUSIONS: The Martius flap is not associated with a significant amount of perceived cosmetic disfigurement. It has relatively little effect on sexual relations. Postoperatively discomfort is minimal but there may be associated numbness or decreased sensation at the harvest site.