Literature DB >> 11956432

Percent of cancer in the biopsy set predicts pathological findings after prostatectomy.

David J Grossklaus1, Christopher S Coffey, Scott B Shappell, Gregory S Jack, Sam S Chang, Michael S Cookson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The ability to use pretreatment variables to identify patients with organ confined prostate cancer continues to challenge physicians. We examined information available preoperatively, including prostate needle biopsy, clinical stage and preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA), and evaluated these data based on pathological variables after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed results in 135 consecutive patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy at a single institution. Needle biopsy information, such as the number of cores, percent of tumor per biopsy set, laterality of positive cores and Gleason sum, were compared with pathological data on the radical retropubic prostatectomy specimen, including pathological stage, Gleason sum and tumor volume. Clinical data, including biopsy information and pathological findings, were compared using univariate and multivariate models.
RESULTS: Overall total PSA, percent of tumor in the biopsy and bilateral positive cores directly correlated with tumor volume (p <0.01). Also, increasing PSA, increasing percent of tumor in the biopsy and bilateral positive cores were associated with increased risks of extracapsular extension (p <0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: From the information readily available from prostate needle biopsy these results suggest that percent of tumor in the biopsy is a useful predictor of pathological stage and tumor volume. Furthermore, including percent of tumor in the biopsy set and bilateral disease with traditional variables such as serum PSA and clinical stage may improve pretreatment tumor staging. This finding adds additional credence to the inclusion of percent of tumor in the biopsy set in models for the preoperative prediction of pathological stage and should be factored into discussions with patients on treatment options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11956432     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65077-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

Review 1.  Methods for volume assessment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Stefan Corvin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Various morphometric measurements of cancer extent on needle prostatic biopsies: which is predictive of pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Maisa M Q Quintal; Luciana R Meirelles; Leandro L L Freitas; Luis A Magna; Ubirajara Ferreira; Athanase Billis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Can lymphatic vascular density be used in determining metastatic spreading potential of tumor in invasive ductal carcinomas?

Authors:  Nilufer Onak Kandemir; Figen Barut; Sibel Bektas; Sukru Oguz Ozdamar
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Prostate cancer at the peripheral end of prostate biopsy specimen predicts increased risk of positive resection margin after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Anton Ponholzer; Sophina Trubel; Paul Schramek; Florian Wimpissinger; Hans Feichtinger; Christopher Springer; Clemens Wehrberger; Katja Fischereder; Karl Pummer; Thomas Martini; Roman Mayr; Armin Pycha; Stephan Madersbacher
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Significance of the percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer as a predictor of disease extension in radical prostatectomy specimens in Japanese men.

Authors:  Iori Sakai; Ken-ichi Harada; Isao Hara; Hiroshi Eto; Hideaki Miyake
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Is quadrant biopsy sufficient in men likely to have advanced prostate cancer? Comparison with extended biopsy.

Authors:  Zoran Brnic; Slavko Gasparov; Petar Vladislav Lozo; Petar Anic; Leonardo Patrlj; Vesna Ramljak
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 3.201

7.  Important preoperative prognostic factors for extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node involvement in cases with radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  A Ozgür; F F Onol; L N Türkeri
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  Active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer: current and future challenges.

Authors:  Christopher Sejong Han; Jaspreet Singh Parihar; Isaac Yi Kim
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2013-12-25

9.  Information of prostate biopsy positive core: does it affect MR detection of prostate cancer on using 3T-MRI?

Authors:  Rika Yoshida; Yasushi Kaji; Yukihisa Tamaki; Takashi Katsube; Hajime Kitagaki; Tsunehito Kanbara; Takao Kamai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.374

10.  Predictive values for extracapsular extension in prostate cancer patients with PSA values below 10 ng/mL.

Authors:  Zülfü Sertkaya; Metin İshak Öztürk; Orhan Koca; Mustafa Güneş; Muhammet İhsan Karaman
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.