Literature DB >> 11956261

Analysis of clinical stage T2 prostate cancer: do current subclassifications represent an improvement?

Ilias Cagiannos1, Markus Graefen, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Makato Ohori, James A Eastham, Farhang Rabbani, William Fair, Thomas M Wheeler, Peter G Hammerer, Alexander Haese, Andreas Erbersdobler, Hartwig Huland, Peter T Scardino, Michael W Kattan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the extent of palpable cancer within the prostate predicts outcome after radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We combined prospectively collected data on 1,755 consecutive clinical stage T2 patients treated with radical prostatectomy alone at four institutions. According to the 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis system, 645 (37%) were T2a, 758 (43%) were T2b, and 352 (20%) were T2c. Kaplan-Meier and proportional hazards regression analyses were performed on the 1992 and 1997 T2 subclassifications. After controlling for the effects of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and biopsy Gleason sum, the two staging systems were compared for their ability to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS). Adjusted RFS curves were constructed using the corrected group prognosis method.
RESULTS: Follow-up ranged from 1 to 166 months (median, 26 months). Cancer recurred in 417 (24%) of the T2 patients. The 1992 (P =.005) but not the 1997 (P =.100) T2 subclassification predicted outcome after controlling for PSA and Gleason sum. After covariate adjustment, RFS was 7% higher at 5 years in the 1992 T2a subcategory relative to the T2b subcategory.
CONCLUSION: The 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer system is superior to the 1997 system, and the former adds prognostic information to a model containing pretreatment PSA and Gleason sum. These results suggest that 1992 T2 subclassification derived from palpable findings improves prognostication over the 1997 subclassification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11956261     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  1 in total

1.  Should pathologists continue to use the current pT2 substaging system for reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens?

Authors:  Athanase Billis; Luciana L Meirelles; Leandro L L Freitas; Luis A Magna; Leonardo O Reis; Ubirajara Ferreira
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 2.370

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.