Literature DB >> 11954982

Assessment of the risk of heat disorders encountered during work in hot conditions.

J Malchaire1, B Kampmann, P Mehnert, H Gebhardt, A Piette, G Havenith, I Holmér, K Parsons, G Alfano, B Griefahn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To co-ordinate the work of the main European research teams in the field of thermal factors in order to develop and improve significantly the methods presently available for assessing the risks of heat disorders encountered during work in hot conditions.
METHOD: Each item from the required sweat rate model was reviewed on the basis of the most recent literature. A database with 1,113 laboratory and field experiments, covering the whole range of hot working conditions, was assembled and used for the validation.
RESULTS: Influence of clothing ensemble on heat exchange: methods and formulas were developed that take into account the dynamic effects associated with forced convection and the pumping effect associated with body movements and exercise. Prediction of the average skin temperature: the model used in the required sweat rate standard ISO 7933 was extended to cover more severe conditions with high radiation and high humidity and different clothing and take into account the rectal temperature for the prediction of the skin temperature. Criteria for estimating acceptable exposure times in hot work environments: criteria were reviewed and updated concerning the maximum increase in core temperature and the acceptable water loss, for acclimatised and nonacclimatised subjects. These limits are intended to protect 95% of the population. Measuring strategy: a strategy was developed to assess the risks in any working situation with varying conditions of climate, metabolic rate or clothing. A detailed methodology was developed in three stages: an "observation" method for the recognition of the conditions that might lead to thermal stress; an "analysis" method for evaluating the problem and optimising the solutions; and an "expert" method for in-depth analysis of the working situation when needed. VALIDATION: the different results were used to prepare a revision of the interpretation procedure proposed in the ISO standard 7933. We validated the modified approaches using the database. This involved the whole range of conditions for which the model was extended, namely conditions with high and low radiation, humidity and air velocity as well as fluctuating conditions. Based on these results, the predicted heat strain model was developed: it is presently proposed as an ISO and CEN standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11954982     DOI: 10.1007/s004200100287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  6 in total

1.  Estimation of respiratory heat flows in prediction of heat strain among Taiwanese steel workers.

Authors:  Wang-Yi Chen; Yow-Jer Juang; Jung-Yu Hsieh; Perng-Jy Tsai; Chen-Peng Chen
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Indicators to assess physiological heat strain - Part 2: Delphi exercise.

Authors:  Leonidas G Ioannou; Petros C Dinas; Sean R Notley; Flora Gofa; George A Gourzoulidis; Matt Brearley; Yoram Epstein; George Havenith; Michael N Sawka; Peter Bröde; Igor B Mekjavic; Glen P Kenny; Thomas E Bernard; Lars Nybo; Andreas D Flouris
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2022-03-27

3.  Assessment of thermal environments: working conditions in the portuguese glass industry.

Authors:  A Virgílio M Oliveira; Adélio R Gaspar; António M Raimundo; Divo A Quintela
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 2.179

4.  Insulation and Evaporative Resistance of Clothing for Sugarcane Harvesters and Chemical Sprayers, and Their Application in PHS Model-Based Exposure Predictions.

Authors:  Kalev Kuklane; Róbert Toma; Rebekah A I Lucas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Heat stress assessment in artistic glass units.

Authors:  Francesca Romana d'AMBROSIO Alfano; Boris Igor Palella; Giuseppe Riccio; Massimo Bartalini; Fabio Strambi; Jacques Malchaire
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.179

6.  Comparison of correction factor for both dynamic total thermal insulation and evaporative resistance between ISO 7933 and ISO 9920.

Authors:  Satoru Ueno
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.867

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.