Literature DB >> 11953603

Revision of the failed distal femoral replacement to allograft prosthetic composite.

Ross M Wilkins1, Cynthia M Kelly.   

Abstract

Orthopaedic oncologists often prefer a modular prosthetic cemented prosthesis for reconstruction after tumor excision in the distal femur. However, these frequently young patients face the prospect of either mechanical failure or loosening during their lifetime. Between 1993 and 2000, 41 patients (18 males, 23 females) with a malignancy of the distal femur had distal femoral replacement. Eight revisions and one amputation were required. Of these, four patients had revision to an allograft-prosthetic composite because of prosthetic fracture or loosening. These patients comprise the study population. Revisions were required at an average of 4 years after distal femoral replacement and the average age of the patients at revision was 17 years. The average time to achieve healing at the allograft-host junction was approximately 3 months and patients were fully weightbearing by that time. Followup from revision surgery to the last visit averaged 59 months, with average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society and Hospital for Special Surgery scores of 62% and 72%, respectively. There have been no mechanical problems, fractures, or osteolysis to signify loosening in the allograft or host bone. It is anticipated that this type of revision will survive longer than a conventional cemented revision and obviate the need for multiple reoperations in young patients who have difficulty with the biologic features of a cemented prosthesis construct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11953603     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200204000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  6 in total

Review 1.  Megaprosthesis versus Allograft Prosthesis Composite for massive skeletal defects.

Authors:  Deepak Gautam; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-09-25

2.  Revision Distal Femoral Arthroplasty With the Compress(®) Prosthesis Has a Low Rate of Mechanical Failure at 10 Years.

Authors:  Melissa N Zimel; German L Farfalli; Alexandra M Zindman; Elyn R Riedel; Carol D Morris; Patrick J Boland; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Case report: Osteochondritis dissecans in twins: treatment with fresh osteochondral grafts.

Authors:  Timothy Mackie; Ross M Wilkins
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Cemented distal femoral endoprostheses for musculoskeletal tumor: improved survival of modular versus custom implants.

Authors:  Adam J Schwartz; J Michael Kabo; Fritz C Eilber; Frederick R Eilber; Jeffrey J Eckardt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Distal Femur Allograft Prosthetic Composite Reconstruction for Short Proximal Femur Segments following Tumor Resection.

Authors:  Bryan S Moon; Nathan F Gilbert; Christopher P Cannon; Patrick P Lin; Valerae O Lewis
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-11-17

6.  Plastic lengthening amputation with vascularized bone grafts in children with bone sarcoma: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Zhao; Qinglin Jin; Xianbiao Xie; Yongqian Wang; Tiao Lin; Junqiang Yin; Gang Huang; Changye Zou; Jingnan Shen
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.754

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.