Literature DB >> 11953599

Prereferral evaluation of patients with suspected bone and soft tissue tumors.

Albert J Aboulafia1, Alan M Levin, James Blum.   

Abstract

One hundred consecutive patients referred to an orthopaedic oncology practice for evaluation of suspected bone or soft tissue tumors were studied prospectively. There were 76 patients with bone lesions and 24 patients with soft tissue lesions. At the time of initial consultation, information regarding the referring diagnosis, number of prior physician office visits, and prereferral imaging studies obtained was collected. There were 50 patients with benign tumors, 17 patients with primary malignant tumors, 11 patients with metastatic tumors, and 22 patients with nonneoplastic conditions. The average number of physician visits before referral for the entire group was 4.8 visits and was highest for patients with malignant bone tumors (6.2 visits). Imaging studies obtained before referral included plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, bone scans, computed tomography scans, and ultrasound. None of the plain radiographs were thought to be unnecessary; however, 26 of 76 (34.2%) magnetic resonance imaging scans, 17 of 40 (42.5%) bone scans, and 13 of 36 (36.1%) computed tomography scans were excessive and did not contribute to the evaluation of the lesion. Although only 58% of the study group included patients with benign bone tumors and nonneoplastic bone lesions, they accounted for the majority (79%) of unnecessary imaging studies. Primary care physicians and general orthopaedic physicians were equally likely to order unnecessary imaging studies (48% and 52%, respectively).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11953599     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200204000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of imaging utilization prior to referral of musculoskeletal tumors: a prospective study.

Authors:  Lukas M Nystrom; Nickolas B Reimer; Cooper W Dean; Charles H Bush; Mark T Scarborough; C Parker Gibbs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Prereferral MRI use in patients with musculoskeletal tumors is not excessive.

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; Jose Morcuende; Joseph A Buckwalter; Benjamin J Miller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  What is the use of imaging before referral to an orthopaedic oncologist? A prospective, multicenter investigation.

Authors:  Benjamin J Miller; Raffi S Avedian; Rajiv Rajani; Lee Leddy; Jeremy R White; Judd Cummings; Tessa Balach; Kevin MacDonald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Is Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging Overutilized in Current Practice?

Authors:  Young Dong Song; Nimesh Prakash Jain; Seok Jin Kim; Sae Kwang Kwon; Moon Jong Chang; Chong Bum Chang; Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2015-06-01

5.  The appropriate and sequential value of standard radiograph, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging to characterize a bone tumor.

Authors:  M Gaume; S Chevret; R Campagna; F Larousserie; D Biau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.