Literature DB >> 11953242

Understanding weight stigmatization: a focus group study.

N H Cossrow1, R W Jeffery, M T McGuire.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to investigate, in a nonclinical sample of adults, thoughts on and experiences with weight stigmatization.
DESIGN: Focus groups were used to collect information. Participants were recruited through a newspaper advertisement and flyers posted in public places in Minneapolis and St. Paul. During the focus groups, participants were led in a discussion about their thoughts on weight stigmatization and personal experiences of being treated differently or poorly because of their weight.
SUBJECTS: Six gender-specific focus groups consisted of 31 adult volunteers (17 women and 14 men). VARIABLES MEASURED: Perceptions of weight-based stereotypes and weight stigmatization and personal reports of having been treated differently or poorly owing to weight were measured.
RESULTS: Participants reported a variety of experiences of being treated differently or poorly because of their weight. These included teasing, harassment, slurs and insults, negative judgments and assumptions, and perceived discrimination. Participants reported that such experiences occurred at home, among friends and strangers, at work, and in health care settings. Women reported a greater number and a greater variety of negative experiences than men. IMPLICATIONS: The results indicated that participants experienced weight-based stigmatization in many aspects of their lives. Awareness of these experiences may assist in the development of treatments for overweight individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11953242     DOI: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60033-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Educ        ISSN: 0022-3182


  10 in total

1.  Patient and parent perspectives on treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Melanie J Donnelly; Lori A Dolan; Linda Grande; Stuart L Weinstein
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2004

2.  Distinguishing emotional coregulation from codysregulation: an investigation of emotional dynamics and body weight in romantic couples.

Authors:  Rebecca G Reed; Kobus Barnard; Emily A Butler
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2015-02

3.  Associations between obesity and receipt of screening mammography, Papanicolaou tests, and influenza vaccination: results from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD) Study.

Authors:  Truls Østbye; Donald H Taylor; William S Yancy; Katrina M Krause
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  African Americans' perceptions of physician attempts to address obesity in the primary care setting.

Authors:  Stephanie H Ward; Anastasia M Gray; Anuradha Paranjape
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Executive function and food approach behavior in middle childhood.

Authors:  Karoline Groppe; Birgit Elsner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-19

6.  Understanding the links between resilience and type-2 diabetes self-management: a qualitative study in South Australia.

Authors:  A L Wilson; D McNaughton; S B Meyer; P R Ward
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2017-09-21

7.  Perception of obesity and overweight among adults living in suburban Nepal: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sachita Shrestha; Shanta Asthanee; Biraj Man Karmacharya; Seema Subedi; Rajendra Koju
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Fat stigma and body objectification: A text analysis approach using social media content.

Authors:  Vajisha U Wanniarachchi; Chris Scogings; Teo Susnjak; Anuradha Mathrani
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-08-15

9.  'Diabesity' down under: overweight and obesity as cultural signifiers for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Darlene McNaughton
Journal:  Crit Public Health       Date:  2013-02-18

10.  BMI and dissatisfaction with life: contextual factors and socioemotional costs of obesity.

Authors:  Ewa Jarosz; Alexi Gugushvili
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.147

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.