OBJECTIVES: To measure the prevalence of depression amongst postpartum and non-postpartum Nepalese women in Kathmandu using the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) and to assess the ease of use and validity of the scale compared with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria for major depression. METHODS: We screened 100 women 2-3 months post-delivery and 40 control women using the EPDS. All those who screened positive for depression and 20% of the negatives also underwent a structured interview to assess depression by DSM-IV criteria. RESULTS: Predictive errors were minimized by using an EPDS score > or =13 to define depression. Using this threshold, there was no difference in depression prevalence between postpartum women (12%) and the control group (12.5%) (Fisher's exact test, P > 0.05). Compared with DSM-IV, the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values were 100, 92.6 and 41.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of postpartum depression (PPD) in Nepalese women and the validity and ease of use of the EPDS in the setting of a postnatal clinic in Kathmandu are all surprisingly similar to the results of numerous studies in developed countries. Despite poor living conditions, PPD is no more common than the background depression rate amongst Nepalese women. It can be reliably detected by trained clinical nurses using the EPDS screening test. These results may have implications for the planning of mental health resources for women in other developing countries.
OBJECTIVES: To measure the prevalence of depression amongst postpartum and non-postpartum Nepalese women in Kathmandu using the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) and to assess the ease of use and validity of the scale compared with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria for major depression. METHODS: We screened 100 women 2-3 months post-delivery and 40 control women using the EPDS. All those who screened positive for depression and 20% of the negatives also underwent a structured interview to assess depression by DSM-IV criteria. RESULTS: Predictive errors were minimized by using an EPDS score > or =13 to define depression. Using this threshold, there was no difference in depression prevalence between postpartum women (12%) and the control group (12.5%) (Fisher's exact test, P > 0.05). Compared with DSM-IV, the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values were 100, 92.6 and 41.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of postpartum depression (PPD) in Nepalese women and the validity and ease of use of the EPDS in the setting of a postnatal clinic in Kathmandu are all surprisingly similar to the results of numerous studies in developed countries. Despite poor living conditions, PPD is no more common than the background depression rate amongst Nepalese women. It can be reliably detected by trained clinical nurses using the EPDS screening test. These results may have implications for the planning of mental health resources for women in other developing countries.
Authors: Jane Fisher; Meena Cabral de Mello; Vikram Patel; Atif Rahman; Thach Tran; Sara Holton; Wendy Holmes Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2011-11-24 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Nicolas Hoertel; Saioa López; Hugo Peyre; Melanie M Wall; Ana González-Pinto; Frédéric Limosin; Carlos Blanco Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Sumitra Devi Shrestha; Rina Pradhan; Thach D Tran; Rosa C Gualano; Jane R W Fisher Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Cosme Alvarado-Esquivel; Antonio Sifuentes-Alvarez; Carlos Salas-Martinez; Sergio Martínez-García Journal: Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health Date: 2006-11-29