BACKGROUND:Angiotensin II (Ang II) is assumed to play a pathophysiological role in a variety of vascular diseases. Animal studies indicate that these effects are partly attributed to stimulation of endothelin-1 (ET-1) release. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the acute effects of Ang II on systemic and renal haemodynamics in healthy subjects can be influenced by endothelin ET(A)-receptor blockade. DESIGN: The study design was balanced, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind, two-way cross-over, in 10 healthy male subjects. METHODS: Subjects received stepwise increasing intravenous doses of Ang II (0.65, 1.25, 2.5, 5 ng kg(-1) min(-1) for 15 min per dose level) in the presence or absence of BQ-123 (60 microg min(-1)), a specific ETA-receptor antagonist. Renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were assessed by the para-aminohippurate and inulin plasma clearance method, respectively. Renal vascular resistance (RVR) was calculated from mean arterial pressure (MAP) and renal plasma flow. RESULTS: Ang II decreased RPF by 34% and GFR by 9% and increased RVR by 94% and MAP by 27% (ANOVA, P < 0.001 vs. baseline, for all parameters). BQ-123 did not alter these renal and systemic haemodynamic responses to a significant degree. In addition, BQ-123 had no significant haemodynamic effect under baseline conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term increase of circulating Ang II levels causes systemic and renal pressor effects, which are not mitigated by endothelin ETA-receptor blockade. This suggests that the pressor response to Ang II cannot be accounted for by the acute release of vasoactive ET-1.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Angiotensin II (Ang II) is assumed to play a pathophysiological role in a variety of vascular diseases. Animal studies indicate that these effects are partly attributed to stimulation of endothelin-1 (ET-1) release. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the acute effects of Ang II on systemic and renal haemodynamics in healthy subjects can be influenced by endothelin ET(A)-receptor blockade. DESIGN: The study design was balanced, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind, two-way cross-over, in 10 healthy male subjects. METHODS: Subjects received stepwise increasing intravenous doses of Ang II (0.65, 1.25, 2.5, 5 ng kg(-1) min(-1) for 15 min per dose level) in the presence or absence of BQ-123 (60 microg min(-1)), a specific ETA-receptor antagonist. Renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were assessed by the para-aminohippurate and inulin plasma clearance method, respectively. Renal vascular resistance (RVR) was calculated from mean arterial pressure (MAP) and renal plasma flow. RESULTS:Ang II decreased RPF by 34% and GFR by 9% and increased RVR by 94% and MAP by 27% (ANOVA, P < 0.001 vs. baseline, for all parameters). BQ-123 did not alter these renal and systemic haemodynamic responses to a significant degree. In addition, BQ-123 had no significant haemodynamic effect under baseline conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term increase of circulating Ang II levels causes systemic and renal pressor effects, which are not mitigated by endothelin ETA-receptor blockade. This suggests that the pressor response to Ang II cannot be accounted for by the acute release of vasoactive ET-1.