U Linstedt1, O Meyer, P Kropp, A Berkau, E Tapp, M Zenz. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany. linstedt@anesthia.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: S-100 protein serum concentration (S-100) serves as a marker of cerebral ischemia in cardiac surgery, head injury and stroke. In these circumstances S-100 corresponds well with the results of neuropsychological tests. The aim of the present study was to investigate the value of S-100 and neuron specific enolase (NSE) in reflecting postoperative cognitive deficit (POCD) after general surgical procedures. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients undergoing vascular, trauma, urological or abdominal surgery were investigated. Serum values of S-100 and NSE were determined preoperatively and 0.5, 4, 18 and 36 h postoperatively. Neuropsychological tests for detecting POCD were performed preoperatively and on day 1, 3, and 6 after the operation. A decline of more than 10% in neuropsychological test results was regarded as POCD. Furthermore, we retrospectively compared the S-100 in patients with and without POCD in different types of surgery. RESULTS: According to our definition, forty-eight patients had POCD (95% confidence interval: 37.5-58.5). These patients showed higher serum concentrations of S-100 (median 024 ng/ml; range 0.01-3.3 ng/ml) compared with those without POCD (n=69; median 0.14 ng/ml; range 0-1.34 ng/ml) 30 min postoperatively (P=0.01). Neuron specific enolase was unchanged during the course of the study. Differences of S-100 in patients with and without POCD were found in abdominal and vascular surgery but not in urological surgery. CONCLUSION: When all patients are pooled, S-100 appears to be suitable in the assessment of incidence, course and outcome of cognitive deficits. We suspect that in some surgical procedures, such as urological surgery, S-100 appears to be of limited value in detecting POCD. Neuron specific enolase did not reflect neuropsychological dysfunction after noncardiac surgery.
BACKGROUND:S-100 protein serum concentration (S-100) serves as a marker of cerebral ischemia in cardiac surgery, head injury and stroke. In these circumstances S-100 corresponds well with the results of neuropsychological tests. The aim of the present study was to investigate the value of S-100 and neuron specific enolase (NSE) in reflecting postoperative cognitive deficit (POCD) after general surgical procedures. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients undergoing vascular, trauma, urological or abdominal surgery were investigated. Serum values of S-100 and NSE were determined preoperatively and 0.5, 4, 18 and 36 h postoperatively. Neuropsychological tests for detecting POCD were performed preoperatively and on day 1, 3, and 6 after the operation. A decline of more than 10% in neuropsychological test results was regarded as POCD. Furthermore, we retrospectively compared the S-100 in patients with and without POCD in different types of surgery. RESULTS: According to our definition, forty-eight patients had POCD (95% confidence interval: 37.5-58.5). These patients showed higher serum concentrations of S-100 (median 024 ng/ml; range 0.01-3.3 ng/ml) compared with those without POCD (n=69; median 0.14 ng/ml; range 0-1.34 ng/ml) 30 min postoperatively (P=0.01). Neuron specific enolase was unchanged during the course of the study. Differences of S-100 in patients with and without POCD were found in abdominal and vascular surgery but not in urological surgery. CONCLUSION: When all patients are pooled, S-100 appears to be suitable in the assessment of incidence, course and outcome of cognitive deficits. We suspect that in some surgical procedures, such as urological surgery, S-100 appears to be of limited value in detecting POCD. Neuron specific enolase did not reflect neuropsychological dysfunction after noncardiac surgery.
Authors: Finn M Radtke; Martin Franck; Norbert Papkalla; Tim S Herbig; Edith Weiss-Gerlach; Robin Kleinwaechter; Klaus D Wernecke; Claudia D Spies Journal: J Anesth Date: 2010-05-28 Impact factor: 2.078
Authors: David L McDonagh; Joseph P Mathew; Willam D White; Barbara Phillips-Bute; Daniel T Laskowitz; Mihai V Podgoreanu; Mark F Newman Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Duc Nam Nguyen; Luc Huyghens; Francis Wellens; Johan Schiettecatte; Johan Smitz; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Clive Ballard; Emma Jones; Nathan Gauge; Dag Aarsland; Odd Bjarte Nilsen; Brian K Saxby; David Lowery; Anne Corbett; Keith Wesnes; Eirini Katsaiti; James Arden; Derek Amoako; Derek Amaoko; Nicholas Prophet; Balaji Purushothaman; David Green Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 3.240