OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the results of the use of GnRH antagonist (GnRHant) and GnRH analog (GnRHa) in two matched groups of unselected IVF/ICSI patients in a retrospective matched pair analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Patients (n=52) were stimulated with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and/or recombinant FSH (rFSH). In Group I (n=26) a daily dose of 0.25mg of Cetrorelix (GnRHant) was administered when follicles reached a diameter of > or = 14 mm. Patients in Group II (n=26) were first desensitized with GnRHa triptorelin long protocol, which was continued during the gonadotropins treatment until the induction of ovulation. RESULTS: In both groups, serum LH levels remained low during the stimulation. The mean length of stimulation, and the dose of FSH required per patient were similar in both groups. The mean E2 level on day of hCG administration was significantly higher in the patients of Group II (2076+/-1430 versus 1145+/-605 pg/ml), however, a progressive increase in serum E2 concentration during the cycle was noted in both groups. A median of 5.38 and 6.34 mature oocytes per patient was obtained, and the fertilization rate was 59.3% in Group I and 63.6% in Group II. Pregnancy rate (PR) were better in Group II (15 versus 5%), and no severe or moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) occurred. CONCLUSIONS: GnRHant and GnRHa provide comparable results in unselected patients, while GnRHant allows a higher flexibility in the treatment.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the results of the use of GnRH antagonist (GnRHant) and GnRH analog (GnRHa) in two matched groups of unselected IVF/ICSIpatients in a retrospective matched pair analysis. STUDY DESIGN:Patients (n=52) were stimulated with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and/or recombinant FSH (rFSH). In Group I (n=26) a daily dose of 0.25mg of Cetrorelix (GnRHant) was administered when follicles reached a diameter of > or = 14 mm. Patients in Group II (n=26) were first desensitized with GnRHa triptorelin long protocol, which was continued during the gonadotropins treatment until the induction of ovulation. RESULTS: In both groups, serum LH levels remained low during the stimulation. The mean length of stimulation, and the dose of FSH required per patient were similar in both groups. The mean E2 level on day of hCG administration was significantly higher in the patients of Group II (2076+/-1430 versus 1145+/-605 pg/ml), however, a progressive increase in serum E2 concentration during the cycle was noted in both groups. A median of 5.38 and 6.34 mature oocytes per patient was obtained, and the fertilization rate was 59.3% in Group I and 63.6% in Group II. Pregnancy rate (PR) were better in Group II (15 versus 5%), and no severe or moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) occurred. CONCLUSIONS:GnRHant and GnRHa provide comparable results in unselected patients, while GnRHant allows a higher flexibility in the treatment.
Authors: Ralf Dittrich; Laura Lotz; Andreas Mueller; Inge Hoffmann; David L Wachter; Kerstin U Amann; Matthias W Beckmann; Thomas Hildebrandt Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 5.211