Debora Matthews1, Angela Rocchi, Amiram Gafni. 1. Division of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. debora.matthews@dal.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To measure preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for a novel anaesthetic (dental gel) versus existing anaesthetic options for periodontal maintenance visits. DESIGN: The study was conducted by developing and administering a survey, composed of a modified decision aid and a WTP instrument. The decision aid provided clinical information in layman's terms. Patients stated their anaesthetic preference; WTP elicited the hypothetical amount of money a subject would pay to have dental gel available for maintenance cleaning, should they require anaesthetic. PATIENTS: Periodontal recall patients (n = 97; 'recall') and participants from the general population (n = 196; 'general') from southwestern Ontario, Canada. RESULTS: The overwhelming majority of participants chose dental gel over injectable local anaesthetic or no anaesthetic as their first anaesthetic preference (general: 81.0%; recall: 82.5%). The median WTP for dental gel was 20.00 Canadian dollars (dollars Can) per visit for the general population and dollars Can10.00 for the recall population (1999 values). The majority of participants were willing to pay an insurance premium for dental gel, even if they did not personally prefer dental gel (general: 72.4%; recall: 73.2%). The median monthly premium to have dental gel available for any plan beneficiary requiring scaling and root planing (SRP) during maintenance was dollars Can2.00 per month for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, an alternative to traditional injectable local anaesthetic (i.e. dental gel) was overwhelmingly preferred by both general population participants and recall patients for maintenance cleaning procedures. Most participants were willing to pay to have dental gel available, either for themselves or for others.
OBJECTIVES: To measure preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for a novel anaesthetic (dental gel) versus existing anaesthetic options for periodontal maintenance visits. DESIGN: The study was conducted by developing and administering a survey, composed of a modified decision aid and a WTP instrument. The decision aid provided clinical information in layman's terms. Patients stated their anaesthetic preference; WTP elicited the hypothetical amount of money a subject would pay to have dental gel available for maintenance cleaning, should they require anaesthetic. PATIENTS: Periodontal recall patients (n = 97; 'recall') and participants from the general population (n = 196; 'general') from southwestern Ontario, Canada. RESULTS: The overwhelming majority of participants chose dental gel over injectable local anaesthetic or no anaesthetic as their first anaesthetic preference (general: 81.0%; recall: 82.5%). The median WTP for dental gel was 20.00 Canadian dollars (dollars Can) per visit for the general population and dollars Can10.00 for the recall population (1999 values). The majority of participants were willing to pay an insurance premium for dental gel, even if they did not personally prefer dental gel (general: 72.4%; recall: 73.2%). The median monthly premium to have dental gel available for any plan beneficiary requiring scaling and root planing (SRP) during maintenance was dollars Can2.00 per month for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, an alternative to traditional injectable local anaesthetic (i.e. dental gel) was overwhelmingly preferred by both general population participants and recall patients for maintenance cleaning procedures. Most participants were willing to pay to have dental gel available, either for themselves or for others.
Authors: M K Jeffcoat; N C Geurs; I Magnusson; S R MacNeill; N Mickels; F Roberts; P Robinson; A Salamati; R Yukna Journal: J Periodontol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 6.993
Authors: T Whelan; M Levine; A Gafni; K Sanders; A Willan; D Mirsky; D Schnider; D McCready; S Reid; A Kobylecky; K Reed Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael Iskedjian; Olivier Desjardins; Charles Piwko; Basil Bereza; Barbara Jaszewski; Thomas R Einarson Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2009 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Christopher Vernazza; Lauren Anderson; Andrew Ian Hunter; Helen Christine Leck; Stephen Daniel O'Connor; Gillian Rose Smith; Richard Joseph Stokes; Sarah Rolland Journal: JDR Clin Trans Res Date: 2018-02-12