Literature DB >> 11950181

Clinical, provider and sociodemographic predictors of late initiation of antenatal care in England and Wales.

Emil Kupek1, Stavros Petrou, Sarah Vause, Michael Maresh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that are predictive of late initiation of antenatal care in England and Wales.
DESIGN: A multivariate binomial regression model was constructed to examine the association between clinical, provider and sociodemographic characteristics and late initiation of antenatal care.
SETTING: Nine maternity units in Northern England and North Wales. POPULATION: A total of 20,771 women with a singleton pregnancy who delivered a liveborn or stillborn baby between 1 August 1994 and 31 July 1995. All analyses were based on the 17,765 (85.5%) women for whom information on gestational age at initial presentation for antenatal care and other variables incorporated into the regression model was retrievable from the case records.
RESULTS: Primiparous women of high obstetric risk were 13.4% more likely to initiate antenatal care after 10 weeks of gestation than a low risk reference group (adjusted OR 1.134, 95% CI 1.011, 1.272; P = 0.0312), and 34.3% more likely to initiate antenatal care after 18 weeks of gestation (adjusted OR 1.343, 95% CI 1.046, 1.724; P = 0.0208). This association between high obstetric risk status and late initiation of antenatal care was not replicated among multiparous women. When the effects of other independent variables on gestational age at booking were examined, the following characteristics were associated with failure to initiate antenatal care by 10 weeks of gestation (P < or = 0.05): maternal age at booking, smoking status, ethnicity, type of hospital at booking, the planned pattern of antenatal care and the planned place of delivery. Adopting a criterion of 18 weeks of gestation exacerbated the association between clinical and sociodemographic characteristics and late initiation of antenatal care, but appeared to dilute the association between provider characteristics and late initiation of antenatal care.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a pressing need for further research to identify the specific concerns of late bookers, to identify areas where new interventions might encourage the uptake of services and to gauge the likely impact of increased dissemination of information about the availability of antenatal care services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11950181     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.00524.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  30 in total

1.  Predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants of late initiation of prenatal care.

Authors:  Katrien Beeckman; Fred Louckx; Koen Putman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-10

2.  Determinants of Alcohol Consumption in Women Before and After Awareness of Conception.

Authors:  Kazue Ishitsuka; Kiwako Hanada-Yamamoto; Hidetoshi Mezawa; Mayako Saito-Abe; Mizuho Konishi; Yukihiro Ohya
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-02

3.  Determinants of the intention of preconception care use: lessons from a multi-ethnic urban population in the Netherlands.

Authors:  S Temel; E Birnie; H M Sonneveld; A J J Voorham; G J Bonsel; E A P Steegers; S Denktaş
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  The Association Between Preconception Care Receipt and the Timeliness and Adequacy of Prenatal Care: An Examination of Multistate Data from Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) 2009-2011.

Authors:  Meghan K Wally; Larissa R Brunner Huber; L Michele Issel; Michael E Thompson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-01

5.  Engagement: an indicator of difference in the perceptions of antenatal care for pregnant women from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.

Authors:  Angie Docherty; Carol Bugge; Andrew Watterson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  [Predictors of use of ante-natal care].

Authors:  I Valadez Figueroa; N Alfaro Alfaro; A Celis de la Rosa
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 1.137

7.  Reasons given by pregnant women for late initiation of antenatal care in the niger delta, Nigeria.

Authors:  P N Ebeigbe; E P Ndidi; G O Igberase; I G Oseremen
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2010-06

8.  Differences in timely antenatal care between first and second-generation migrants in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Anushka A Choté; Gerrit T Koopmans; Christianne J M de Groot; Renske J Hoefman; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Albert Hofman; Eric A P Steegers; Johan P Mackenbach; Margo Trappenburg; Marleen Foets
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-08

9.  Factors Associated with Numbers of Antenatal Care Visits in Rural Ethiopia.

Authors:  Melkalem Mamuye Azanaw; Alemayehu Digssie Gebremariam; Fentaw Teshome Dagnaw; Hiwot Yisak; Getaneh Atikilt; Binyam Minuye; Melaku Tadege Engidaw; Desalegn Tesfa; Edgeit Abebe Zewde; Sofonyas Abebaw Tiruneh
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-06-10

10.  Satisfaction with maternity care among recent migrants: an interview questionnaire-based study.

Authors:  Sukhjeet Bains; Johanne Sundby; Benedikte V Lindskog; Siri Vangen; Lien M Diep; Katrine M Owe; Ingvil K Sorbye
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.